Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1020925ybv; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:21:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyBUs340AwGDPuLg2nNtD58ojZftP11dEI3mqc68S27XWsXKOyRUrTjcIeOMA9amCEj+L4a X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1:: with SMTP id c1mr26376889otp.254.1580959299139; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:21:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580959299; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b2zlUJ+idADQO6PVSK7E/muCH9inQ9ZCAxrH4IehqpLHhbgO5AS+qcOK0otyo3QjmJ g9n+m8DisQNNAwfeAYzgwmSwqTZB7/sXkI+CZ8Lny/dJM1Emz02KWzA/fuV5GWHUySvu IaHKly9CXDI0fKNfMx8HJ28H8Rk32ghBVCi6zV3gA83wPt/2ybut7LndwzWn5m+lrdKh /Cqrk/08qi6fZjPOqMA5P9qWbJ1Y5pJCQFqj9pgDO+sTtbPzHyKQ1yhXrXwLVjL3jFxd McFp4Nq3mOEV2AnNRbtHXQEG5eCsLLsKxJ8JbuzMjQyT/kC3ihipIsW/BmPpKAwLlXyT 19eg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=+lC5p0E0TV9dTk+JuTQ7yecXZZJA95oSYZBmBwlkZi4=; b=DgU8keFWBw44HhaUPCp7CPi3YxN+fAxDJtmYOS0vGasdnKJYzzJmNEYvS3UV4MDtAt UV//gUWlAF6Uv8liElGuuL7aRUGop53wmX2QgZcGD2e0MPTIoxxG5yDFJNj1OUEUnwOn Qs8qa1NAm2W7/GPxsFYCGFCpuoVUUnbesRXf0BYDJy+zj7579U+rZjVfxqTUf+e4VUC+ se84S/wEWePO9sFaFPyV/gQscSKPnUutzrUdJT1+93ihBSdKEdLgXkJtI3vs7P0BWm8k h9GSB1MGwJwQfbyenklXbGcHVVx7X/XCnwFGzmJL0r+uyrlYmoeVW7BLBvhMOLO1yPCA k2ig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13si1427809oiy.28.2020.02.05.19.21.25; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 19:21:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727809AbgBFDHU convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:07:20 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:35007 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727307AbgBFDHU (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:07:20 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2020 19:07:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,408,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="235820044" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2020 19:07:19 -0800 Received: from shsmsx153.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.53) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:07:18 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.126]) by SHSMSX153.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.97]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:07:17 +0800 From: "Li, Philip" To: Andi Kleen , "Chen, Rong A" CC: Roman Sudarikov , lkp , Kan Liang , "Antonov, Alexander" , LKML , "lkp@lists.01.org" Subject: RE: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.1% regression Thread-Topic: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.1% regression Thread-Index: AQHV3GVxtV9AZpMZekqZJwJ+vcCDDqgNe3dw Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:07:15 +0000 Message-ID: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E6624952397CEA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20200205123110.GN12867@shao2-debian> <87tv44danp.fsf@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <87tv44danp.fsf@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.1% > regression > > kernel test robot writes: > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed a -2.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to > commit: > > > > > > commit: b77491648e6eb2f26b6edf5eaea859adc17f4dcc ("perf x86: Infrastructure > for exposing an Uncore unit to PMON mapping") > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roman-sudarikov-linux-intel-com/perf- > x86-Exposing-IO-stack-to-IO-PMON-mapping-through-sysfs/20200118-075508 > > Seems to be spurious bisect. I don't think that commit could change > anything performance related. Hi Andi, we will look into this as early as possible, we also receive another input from Pater Z that he got false positive of will-it-scale.per_process_ops performance regression. We will investigate them. > > -Andi > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org