Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750802AbWBFJCX (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 04:02:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750807AbWBFJCX (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 04:02:23 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:30571 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbWBFJCW (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 04:02:22 -0500 Message-ID: <43E7112C.8060001@sw.ru> Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 12:04:44 +0300 From: Kirill Korotaev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426 X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Kirill Korotaev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] Virtualization/containers: startup References: <43E38BD1.4070707@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 17 >>+ struct vps_info *owner_vps; > You don't seem to be any ifdefs for anything. I guess that's ok if the > final virtualization will be really light weight (let's say not more > than a few KB of additional memory including runtime overhead). But > somehow I guess it will be heavier. What are the plans to allow to > CONFIG it all out for small systems? Yes, I will add missing ifdefs to make it compilable without virtualization at all resulting in the normal kernel. Thanks for pointing to this. Kirill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/