Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1292302ybv; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 01:18:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1MtjsVihnERnIZVMLwCRcjp4VlYKF9x1EoPTq6yn0gRssbUVAcsXonGwyWFxBRGgN/TmT X-Received: by 2002:aca:c493:: with SMTP id u141mr6298611oif.62.1580980707542; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:18:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1580980707; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jq++JzaoYh/4mJJEBEriUsG3Z81SF+3sexSnSHV3q2h9UjwbeXLjd1BemoVDpBc78j /v3foymPUO3UIRzN4nT5HZ+EY6srHitPrDE1HIN0cWK35Kr0RrNMofvacQ+QYR8UjOdY Y27XlW7S0jt+ht+Pzw07gsDGRk+uVARZn8O+vkcUDznNg2LqkE6KbNuxg3GzoRh8YEGA CKi+8Fhqd03UvMQxj/x2EpUMabCPs58tE9TeFXI/O0kwICSYeZg74PS8F/V7gRIfYsSk 3haUyZ1DUlD42igfe2mn75gdtOO9glHTax6/h37Rbr6nnvseXG+1z1Jm3Qn4FE20xBPX n+Zg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=vPtbCavU1oNbsgcIIRW6CaDQ6Gqsxy99kZxirdM9MS0=; b=rAKwydt6VQztqhvr1HhApB7Ua70e6kHqNr1yD7lKwvN0ye8X9Y1gEzuyVQCR6AymiH vl2VmPeJ/+3NU1UfQaw/aTiO7iqwQ5Oz/oMKbVB7FMTwP72DgtCv/9933hLj8+anfN4l MrtPm5eqYqncRk34BnwiFP9s4Rwq8dceMt2iklqkFloTBaR7u29QsREvSpKAJj7R+xPS 1mrTnxfGVBljBdaSp+7lAq10VYn/RGZ5pru/LPvQ4TPbdTzviY7ej+V6q27QrHAKuB1y fFvoomKrxunx0cvFi0f4+2TN1lQzbx40m8hz/cnwTCEGr0tSxcr0eKRyrZcu07YxDhug bFYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Y2Q+rh76; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7si1785959oie.265.2020.02.06.01.18.15; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Y2Q+rh76; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727946AbgBFIuW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:50:22 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:28036 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726673AbgBFIuV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:50:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580979020; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=vPtbCavU1oNbsgcIIRW6CaDQ6Gqsxy99kZxirdM9MS0=; b=Y2Q+rh76f131uzs9rPFn2PZdoJlgnu7JlII1k/yO9QZdDZfMJk/icTFUBwZr9SC2mfWPEg uv8b+KSpGCAz0AquX4tl6J3XeVz4dBMM5IJQlkXD+g2g3YBn9kFFGxmZqEgaDCp8WADvk8 SfKVsg1j9nfWm5RignowglSBv8zAXO0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-424-xLVolH4EP4OXFQIWEgNyIQ-1; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:50:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xLVolH4EP4OXFQIWEgNyIQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1CA610054E3; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 08:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.188] (ovpn-117-188.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.188]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5397A1A8E4; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hotplug: Adjust shrink_zone_span() to keep the old logic To: Baoquan He , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com, osalvador@suse.de References: <20200206053912.1211-1-bhe@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABtCREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT6JAlgEEwEIAEICGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkIBwMCBhUI AgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl3pImkCGQEACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1o+VA//SFvIHUAvul05u6wKv/pIR6aICPdpF9EIgEU448g+7FfDgQwcEny1pbEzAmiw zAXIQ9H0NZh96lcq+yDLtONnXk/bEYWHHUA014A1wqcYNRY8RvY1+eVHb0uu0KYQoXkzvu+s Dncuguk470XPnscL27hs8PgOP6QjG4jt75K2LfZ0eAqTOUCZTJxA8A7E9+XTYuU0hs7QVrWJ jQdFxQbRMrYz7uP8KmTK9/Cnvqehgl4EzyRaZppshruKMeyheBgvgJd5On1wWq4ZUV5PFM4x II3QbD3EJfWbaJMR55jI9dMFa+vK7MFz3rhWOkEx/QR959lfdRSTXdxs8V3zDvChcmRVGN8U Vo93d1YNtWnA9w6oCW1dnDZ4kgQZZSBIjp6iHcA08apzh7DPi08jL7M9UQByeYGr8KuR4i6e RZI6xhlZerUScVzn35ONwOC91VdYiQgjemiVLq1WDDZ3B7DIzUZ4RQTOaIWdtXBWb8zWakt/ ztGhsx0e39Gvt3391O1PgcA7ilhvqrBPemJrlb9xSPPRbaNAW39P8ws/UJnzSJqnHMVxbRZC Am4add/SM+OCP0w3xYss1jy9T+XdZa0lhUvJfLy7tNcjVG/sxkBXOaSC24MFPuwnoC9WvCVQ ZBxouph3kqc4Dt5X1EeXVLeba+466P1fe1rC8MbcwDkoUo65Ag0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAGJAiUEGAECAA8FAlXLn5ECGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1qA6w/+M+ggFv+JdVsz5+ZIc6MSyGUozASX+bmIuPeIecc9UsFRatc91LuJCKMkD9Uv GOcWSeFpLrSGRQ1Z7EMzFVU//qVs6uzhsNk0RYMyS0B6oloW3FpyQ+zOVylFWQCzoyyf227y GW8HnXunJSC+4PtlL2AY4yZjAVAPLK2l6mhgClVXTQ/S7cBoTQKP+jvVJOoYkpnFxWE9pn4t H5QIFk7Ip8TKr5k3fXVWk4lnUi9MTF/5L/mWqdyIO1s7cjharQCstfWCzWrVeVctpVoDfJWp 4LwTuQ5yEM2KcPeElLg5fR7WB2zH97oI6/Ko2DlovmfQqXh9xWozQt0iGy5tWzh6I0JrlcxJ ileZWLccC4XKD1037Hy2FLAjzfoWgwBLA6ULu0exOOdIa58H4PsXtkFPrUF980EEibUp0zFz GotRVekFAceUaRvAj7dh76cToeZkfsjAvBVb4COXuhgX6N4pofgNkW2AtgYu1nUsPAo+NftU CxrhjHtLn4QEBpkbErnXQyMjHpIatlYGutVMS91XTQXYydCh5crMPs7hYVsvnmGHIaB9ZMfB njnuI31KBiLUks+paRkHQlFcgS2N3gkRBzH7xSZ+t7Re3jvXdXEzKBbQ+dC3lpJB0wPnyMcX FOTT3aZT7IgePkt5iC/BKBk3hqKteTnJFeVIT7EC+a6YUFg= Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <7ecaf36f-9f70-05bd-05fc-6dec82b7d559@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 09:50:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200206053912.1211-1-bhe@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06.02.20 06:39, Baoquan He wrote: > In commit 950b68d9178b ("mm/memory_hotplug: don't check for "all holes" > in shrink_zone_span()"), the zone->zone_start_pfn/->spanned_pages > resetting is moved into the if()/else if() branches, if the zone becomes > empty. However the 2nd resetting code block may cause misunderstanding. > > So take the resetting codes out of the conditional checking and handling > branches just as the old code does, the find_smallest_section_pfn()and > find_biggest_section_pfn() searching have done the the same thing as > the old for loop did, the logic is kept the same as the old code. This > can remove the possible confusion. > > Signed-off-by: Baoquan He > --- > mm/memory_hotplug.c | 14 ++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > index 089b6c826a9e..475d0d68a32c 100644 > --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c > +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c > @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static unsigned long find_biggest_section_pfn(int nid, struct zone *zone, > static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > unsigned long end_pfn) > { > - unsigned long pfn; > + unsigned long pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; > int nid = zone_to_nid(zone); > > zone_span_writelock(zone); > @@ -414,9 +414,6 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > if (pfn) { > zone->spanned_pages = zone_end_pfn(zone) - pfn; > zone->zone_start_pfn = pfn; > - } else { > - zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > - zone->spanned_pages = 0; > } > } else if (zone_end_pfn(zone) == end_pfn) { > /* > @@ -429,10 +426,11 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn, > start_pfn); > if (pfn) > zone->spanned_pages = pfn - zone->zone_start_pfn + 1; > - else { > - zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > - zone->spanned_pages = 0; > - } > + } > + > + if (!pfn) { > + zone->zone_start_pfn = 0; > + zone->spanned_pages = 0; > } > zone_span_writeunlock(zone); > } > So, what if your zone starts at pfn 0? Unlikely that we can actually offline that, but still it is more confusing than the old code IMHO. Then I prefer to drop the second else case as discussed instead. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb