Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] io_uring: clean wq path
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <cover.1580928112.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
 <1fdfd8bf-c0cd-04c0-e22e-bc0945ef1734@gmail.com>
 <8c0639c6-78ad-6240-0c18-d3ef8936e2f4@kernel.dk>
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8ad4a84e-9796-6431-c73e-1d34eed0b0fb@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:51:35 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8c0639c6-78ad-6240-0c18-d3ef8936e2f4@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2/6/2020 5:50 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/5/20 3:29 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> On 05/02/2020 22:07, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>> This is the first series of shaving some overhead for wq-offloading.
>>> The 1st removes extra allocations, and the 3rd req->refs abusing.
>>
>> Rechecked a couple of assumptions, this patchset is messed up.
>> Drop it for now.
> 
> OK, will do, haven't had time to look at it yet anyway.

Sorry for the fuss. I'll return to it later.

> 
> Are you going to do the ->has_user removal? We should just do that
> separately first.
Yes. I've spotted a few bugs, so I'm going to patch them first with
merging/backporting in mind, and then deal with ->has_user. IMO, this
order makes more sense.

-- 
Pavel Begunkov