Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1836963ybv; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:40:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxMaX5OFZOP2vqkUYW+qiH2vqr4GGcTXMhuIiTLHUPo793+TtVJTB8HQz5s87Niq8DeD3bO X-Received: by 2002:aca:f354:: with SMTP id r81mr7651835oih.90.1581014439566; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:40:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581014439; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l5bDDnUVC4hcNRQrdo3zvRMfN9mMXPOpfoMOBdFuFUlHJZn8xEMfu0t8vnfHa1byRu kRRJKidA8WtDNqwrFgahumeAzEIqZ0S/dLaaKGg6maMvp3CMVowCkfDrEEDFZSpdNxUr Xwl5tojEB2UxCq7fU8dRMcVlPqKxKUotNGmfcJNbGz1BchHzTBxF4E0S8eiFHzMMjwtp yXgDo6FH6vH5APRbRsd1r/7UOqQwGK4BNXrlSAeGFXtQ/lOPNJx63yYxP1ESuTvrlGlv AUfLKmBJ7a0nZ92IP1WJ792RZ0II6XyIpbCZy1BOaDOn6i6LOIYJ0b+DpKMrN3f7rjyr QhZg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=QgeB0dU5HtwzfNXky/4wqqP+6ubGtBeJlij3kNSzDk0=; b=sGUTNWoudx1DS88c2j1HWB1eI67mVft80GKvsnjTIg8sHhHszwBxCcSpmcTVa4B0Mh FGnTmjy1SK49faXBsuC9yCt2xVVciMc0oqpXSYaGHBbdPcCwY8Y+LcLGonddA0KWcl6r 8OVOxLRf0FXzN44eg4q8P2iWjyHpbfbL1Ctos0UZ9Ym6YH3cRy1eqCjOaoCE6DXKP3ZQ uQliuVD8/7xwh1YlkkkrKjZDHc1CEuDrxWnEXCEmVimvWzjY2mh+X+OjqoUwUJLdzdbk hGgQkwBNn+vfCdbwlWSGaOW8SEsjrPSb9c2qjebTKfeFlEzcC+Dzqlbhh2mUmskuscx0 3Z5A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m16si272460otj.7.2020.02.06.10.40.26; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727830AbgBFSiZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:38:25 -0500 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:12657 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727358AbgBFSiY (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 13:38:24 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2020 10:38:24 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,410,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="279752683" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2020 10:38:22 -0800 Received: from [10.251.88.4] (abudanko-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com [10.251.88.4]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C645803E3; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:38:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] capabilities: introduce CAP_PERFMON to kernel and user space To: Stephen Smalley , James Morris , Serge Hallyn , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , "joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com" , Alexei Starovoitov , Will Deacon , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman Cc: Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , Stephane Eranian , Igor Lubashev , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "selinux@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , oprofile-list@lists.sf.net References: <576a6141-36d4-14c0-b395-8d195892b916@linux.intel.com> <5be0f67c-17e2-7861-37f3-a0f8a82be8f0@tycho.nsa.gov> <1bcb4cb1-98c4-cc1a-b8e3-fd8a0e1e606f@linux.intel.com> <06cdca0e-65f2-b58d-a84e-5a1907aa9eb5@tycho.nsa.gov> From: Alexey Budankov Organization: Intel Corp. Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 21:38:14 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06cdca0e-65f2-b58d-a84e-5a1907aa9eb5@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06.02.2020 21:30, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On 2/6/20 1:26 PM, Alexey Budankov wrote: >> >> On 06.02.2020 21:23, Stephen Smalley wrote: >>> On 2/5/20 12:30 PM, Alexey Budankov wrote: >>>> >>>> Introduce CAP_PERFMON capability designed to secure system performance >>>> monitoring and observability operations so that CAP_PERFMON would assist >>>> CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability in its governing role for performance monitoring >>>> and observability subsystems. >>>> >>>> CAP_PERFMON hardens system security and integrity during performance >>>> monitoring and observability operations by decreasing attack surface that >>>> is available to a CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileged process [2]. Providing the access >>>> to system performance monitoring and observability operations under CAP_PERFMON >>>> capability singly, without the rest of CAP_SYS_ADMIN credentials, excludes >>>> chances to misuse the credentials and makes the operation more secure. >>>> Thus, CAP_PERFMON implements the principal of least privilege for performance >>>> monitoring and observability operations (POSIX IEEE 1003.1e: 2.2.2.39 principle >>>> of least privilege: A security design principle that states that a process >>>> or program be granted only those privileges (e.g., capabilities) necessary >>>> to accomplish its legitimate function, and only for the time that such >>>> privileges are actually required) >>>> >>>> CAP_PERFMON meets the demand to secure system performance monitoring and >>>> observability operations for adoption in security sensitive, restricted, >>>> multiuser production environments (e.g. HPC clusters, cloud and virtual compute >>>> environments), where root or CAP_SYS_ADMIN credentials are not available to >>>> mass users of a system, and securely unblocks accessibility of system performance monitoring and observability operations beyond root and CAP_SYS_ADMIN use cases. >>>> >>>> CAP_PERFMON takes over CAP_SYS_ADMIN credentials related to system performance >>>> monitoring and observability operations and balances amount of CAP_SYS_ADMIN >>>> credentials following the recommendations in the capabilities man page [1] >>>> for CAP_SYS_ADMIN: "Note: this capability is overloaded; see Notes to kernel >>>> developers, below." For backward compatibility reasons access to system >>>> performance monitoring and observability subsystems of the kernel remains >>>> open for CAP_SYS_ADMIN privileged processes but CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability >>>> usage for secure system performance monitoring and observability operations >>>> is discouraged with respect to the designed CAP_PERFMON capability. >>>> >>>> Although the software running under CAP_PERFMON can not ensure avoidance >>>> of related hardware issues, the software can still mitigate these issues >>>> following the official hardware issues mitigation procedure [2]. The bugs >>>> in the software itself can be fixed following the standard kernel development >>>> process [3] to maintain and harden security of system performance monitoring >>>> and observability operations. >>>> >>>> [1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html >>>> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.html >>>> [3] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/security-bugs.html >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov >>> >>> This will require a small update to the selinux-testsuite to correctly reflect the new capability requirements, but that's easy enough. >> >> Is the suite a part of the kernel sources or something else? > > It is external, > https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite > > I wasn't suggesting that your patch be blocked on updating the testsuite, just noting that it will need to be done. Ok. Thanks! ~Alexey