Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:51:03 +0100
From:   Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc:     support.opensource@diasemi.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        lee.jones@linaro.org, stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com,
        Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com,
        linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] watchdog: da9062: add power management ops
Message-ID: <20200207065103.o5liyfdrl5fudxvh@pengutronix.de>
References: <20200108095704.23233-1-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
 <20200108095704.23233-4-m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
 <20200123205132.GA13377@roeck-us.net>
 <20200206090010.ya6p2kvab452kedr@pengutronix.de>
 <a5d61822-c4fa-d5d3-c3ef-174b57a651bc@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a5d61822-c4fa-d5d3-c3ef-174b57a651bc@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 20-02-06 06:45, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/6/20 1:00 AM, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > On 20-01-23 12:51, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:57:04AM +0100, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > > > Disable the watchdog during suspend if it is enabled and re-enable it on
> > > > resume. So we can sleep without the interruptions.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > 
> > I got an kbuild email so I checked the linux-next master tree. On
> > linux-next this patch isn't used instead the old v1 was used...
> > 
> 
> Yes, it appears that I picked the wrong version as well, and Wim picked it
> up from there. But, really, what do you expect if you don't tag your
> submissions with version numbers ?

Pls check the cover-letter I said sorry their. As I said it was a
mistake.

> I would suggest to send a follow-up patch to fix what is in -next.

A 'real' patch or should I send a 'fixup!' patch?

Regards,
  Marco

> Guenter
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |