Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp738362ybv;
        Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:39:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQFq+pxdhBMtQTh0J0xbUb/a8Z6GUcxnJF7xMikmpvlehhflv1UNs935XFPLHdZf/SaJVV
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1498:: with SMTP id s24mr3351121otq.79.1581089959219;
        Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:39:19 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581089959; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=oCcRKWsTEfFP8DMM0u92KZOJifFu7t9XRE5VbWhM+tScgOAEMNooXS8V1PN1dTUVHy
         2gMZDUYkioxXGB/4eH/EFkpdGu0HRXYIre6iNFxQ+wlGeMFLBpxHc25tRg3xl5PJZati
         It1i511o3liC+eVu0uk+ZZGaXf8077NOzwK4CL/bjWKfAw5XkdwCqwVbt3UA8mlDT1Zd
         whAgmku/esrX4OSJySSPxXf7Q0kzRTuX1YoH8yUWR5MJh5IPa4teAstghcBS5C9N1E++
         RmuXvrf6aibGLIw9ycaEvIk9bGqTW/oCT8htaGm/TNvJ5f5bGKTvDigrgpL+LADz6PaS
         ZjTQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-language:accept-language:message-id:date:thread-index
         :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from;
        bh=nB5CmgBWq08ZLgLTk/YSOQVRvo6PM0iQzSXXFL4gFEw=;
        b=e5hcJXBqGZh+iIlFrzRV4OjFFSFFZ2wImJPcFKUQfSwxz+Do/02Vx/bFrVY+AC4lY8
         jQ83CmY9/7wCJCQ62BLIZDx+9BP+xGg0CRsEhzJuU3WqO3Va6wPLz5f3GaMHhLZdIydg
         /cunGRFA+STbRx4XwZZXgNtQFfNaGFTo7SQw09m40rLpzKkKtTueM+DxTBhI3Movjb97
         U9+2WIugayp4SV2jkBe0DfqXZpIhqsB5LbPy6aexKj++1iuDuDsWfXq9EHSItxvdNDZR
         gvYyrTEFeqmZ3IcMk65z9fQ0WEQi05TA+hkgKuIsJxNtYHHWIXgOPMex/tBPi8a4YZfv
         mL7g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si3476427oic.208.2020.02.07.07.39.07;
        Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727113AbgBGPhR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
        <rfc822;proy.cse@gmail.com> + 99 others);
        Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:37:17 -0500
Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:45068 "EHLO huawei.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726897AbgBGPhQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:37:16 -0500
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54])
        by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E2BAF42169CDF2579051;
        Fri,  7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.111) by
 DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800
Received: from dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.109) by
 dggeme715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800
Received: from dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.36]) by
 dggeme763-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.66.36]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004;
 Fri, 7 Feb 2020 23:37:10 +0800
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
CC:     "thuth@redhat.com" <thuth@redhat.com>,
        "drjones@redhat.com" <drjones@redhat.com>,
        "wei.huang2@amd.com" <wei.huang2@amd.com>,
        "krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com" <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>,
        "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" <eric.auger.pro@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        "vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum
Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: KVM: Remove unused x86_register enum
Thread-Index: AdXdzCUaPbXzvCH9Sx6jLGTWLt8gGw==
Date:   Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:37:10 +0000
Message-ID: <d4aeb0ea2a2d4682a7bbdd8b1ef1ed9f@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.173.221.158]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> writes:
>x86_register enum is not used. Its presence incites us to enumerate GPRs in the same order in other looming structs. So let's remove it.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
>Suggested-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

Make sense for me. Thanks.

Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>