Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp747591ybv; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:50:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyn/J5ch7bb/4glaH55ySr5ab3lHtIL3sL5FmH0O45Xb6Vbi7sXwtr/X1y0D8hFrClkXXBM X-Received: by 2002:a9d:74d0:: with SMTP id a16mr18671otl.228.1581090640247; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:50:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581090640; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AeCuT9wBmdgLXL8N5+B9p/0LecaAjv8Q2YhlPHeVm8VpQbuS+gq2j9nBHXnk3g4t+7 p68F526Etq9LkpCewZqgXCsQYIH1brX+i+GD7IHqHzD3/qT8bBfnflZ3Tep/biYyJm+R ALmS7yLk+4pBj2Cz6ugNlx2t5AF7H/tavy8Mk+efUw4LoL5MK1p3DVl5cmLbzj6w+Hiy dWFUt8igK5Ii69/4CZvr2R/mH5R4IP+EpqXPhk+49pxd+FXc4avqT80rdShDDvyRWRdD Kelf98Vkz54ZbEwszSYfwDu7jtA0P5u5SJlsl/nmZqXqkk9ODgIq8NvdhGrGWRhp7mD+ 4Qig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Qdpp2PA4M3wxYzmXLddX0vj3bKptbh9Tk172/pgwcfg=; b=RVWY/yvKPJ3yHFXA1xnqK7/HsfqHAfoW7bR3fL1mxXVylMAcPOk5ZXU66/m6HsAyYY pw1KViHB1TymAakP+gZ/vXWJQWTREE+ole47JDPNeyvQfOAc0Wj3Hd91tiHJU433vnE1 8a1EivePz6UlgYm/U70ARTR5wZ1VvVAXjTwycla1Ou4UXkcxtLwrNMFspjHfo7RAqyuL E02JfXPk1o+2Ahot/ZMxkEtYY9PzuFBLc/uKNaT0I5wBInf7b9OLbeIv2FGwH+q4G17i ahoid1rLZnkotfdPs7aL+xJT41qF8VzC62c4RFvcXhJzJp/HsicV56WLOe9wNj4eFDuY puqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l23si1750872otj.302.2020.02.07.07.50.27; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 07:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727075AbgBGPtD (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:49:03 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:41402 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726899AbgBGPtD (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:49:03 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1967F1FB; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from bogus (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 337343F68E; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 07:49:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:48:55 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Juri Lelli , Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers base/arch_topology: Remove 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration Message-ID: <20200207154855.GA5529@bogus> References: <20200207114913.3052-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200207114913.3052-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:49:13PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > The sched domain pointer argument from topology_get_freq_scale() and > topology_get_cpu_scale() got removed by commit 7673c8a4c75d > ("sched/cpufreq: Remove arch_scale_freq_capacity()'s 'sd' parameter") > and commit 8ec59c0f5f49 ("sched/topology: Remove unused 'sd' parameter > from arch_scale_cpu_capacity()"). > > So the 'struct sched_domain' forward declaration is no longer needed. > Remove it. > > W/o the sched domain pointer argument the storage class and inline > definition as well as the return type, function name and parameter list > fit all into one line. Looks simple and good to me. I don't want to ask you split the patch as $subject indicates only one of the 2 changes in the patch. I am fine with it as it but if anyone else shout for that, go for the split. Either way, Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla You have not added Greg who generally picks up the patch. Can you repost with him in cc and my reviewed-by so that he can pick it up. -- Regards, Sudeep