Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932234AbWBFSG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:06:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932265AbWBFSG5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:06:57 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:4780 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239AbWBFSG4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:06:56 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cpuset memory spread basic implementation Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:11:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Paul Jackson , mingo@elte.hu, akpm@osdl.org, dgc@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060204071910.10021.8437.sendpatchset@jackhammer.engr.sgi.com> <20060206063549.d155c619.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602061811.49113.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1367 Lines: 29 On Monday 06 February 2006 17:48, Christoph Lameter wrote: > This is very different from the typical case of a single threaded process > roaming across some data and then terminating. In that case we always want > placement of memory as near to the process as possible. In cases were we > are not sure about future application behavior it is best to assume that > node local is best. Spreading memory allocations for storage that is only > accessed from one processor will reduce the performance of an application. > > So the default operating mode needs to be node local. I still don't quite agree. As long as the latency penalty of going off node is not too bad (let's say < factor 2) i think it's better to spread out the caches than to always locate them locally. That is because kernel object/data cache accesses are far less frequent than user mapped memory accesses. And it's a good idea to give the later memory some headstart for local memory. If you have a much worse worst case NUMA factor it might be different, but even there it would be a good idea to at least spread it out to nearby nodes. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/