Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1475110ybv; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 22:55:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzXX6at0SnzpYb5TWtETUx9dI3Sn56trMHmpXknzthdpQTjU7iikBnDxbJHJER4gd1Ok4qk X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1bd5:: with SMTP id v21mr2610216ota.154.1581144916365; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 22:55:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581144916; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k3vcc7kIqK+1iqegYIdGarsMROxmk695s3R88GxzVCoh+wMArUXzeK25Vvun1hqajq 45PeU/M348fN7KFeRgWLBOHfOc0RIKV8AxW/xV2s5JVTB7fCL8FxriZ22RoL8OaqvbUI hZ/wfufiVYAd62ISZJgVOfR645eUyLHA6nfqSutRAeO1ZYroI7rCCuzLyi0zcHRCBdiX sehiKgdJmYfJIPP0jkJTxGo6dBfPrMuieyg173KLzTH3q8anQg+oR19yGJrKMqIFaPb1 RRjPWprQ8l7raeTOWmlUsUDro6yvyBUo+vURJlGVOjlnZKbz1HmL9g4xri25yXmvziJg S6mg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:to:subject; bh=BEck628Dp92n1mrQix+51Hxe/Ypf6evm8U69FadS0dk=; b=E/O3W/THd+fScHW5bBBkAmJpyvOuDoPld7OQ/gVMwNPBSYxLGR6GUPDNesPVfFCZgQ xU+whftuKgFY/vu0ZiiVJ8DH9uVsiThF3kGscalILBFss5glMZ6SnVPt//CboEt1J0DV NFYpS/UXSuo6Z0Q0ftOXbhwq77ElEHYzHCAkngJwfklaLuo6ibxXdLo3Uvc5i7sjaWNa I3FWcmkmWV4QPl2bEgfg1dHP/ZwrCmy6J0yfdTm+fLnnkRDzL5T7sgWP8b4cLwFOtzA8 zFOQSXpCC0S3UyHuzXb8zGWdB2l2kwvzhbWNtzZAv/rSF5rOlfL+Xr+bQmfdJqjaCTXu +qaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e8si4913259oie.96.2020.02.07.22.54.57; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 22:55:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726714AbgBHGxU (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 8 Feb 2020 01:53:20 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:2884 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725789AbgBHGxU (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Feb 2020 01:53:20 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2020 22:53:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,416,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="226706968" Received: from zhiyuanh-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.211.219]) ([10.254.211.219]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2020 22:53:17 -0800 Subject: Re: warning from domain_get_iommu To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200204200714.u4ezhi6vhqhxog6e@cantor> <20200206174358.shzhieijle5wdshr@cantor> <20200207093413.oy4tclbrb3vqs3vz@cantor> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 14:53:16 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200207093413.oy4tclbrb3vqs3vz@cantor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jerry, On 2020/2/7 17:34, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: > On Thu Feb 06 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >> On Tue Feb 04 20, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >>> I'm working on getting a system to reproduce this, and verify it also >>> occurs >>> with 5.5, but I have a report of a case where the kdump kernel gives >>> warnings like the following on a hp dl360 gen9: >>> >>> [    2.830589] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) >>> Driver >>> [    2.832615] ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver >>> [    2.834190] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: EHCI Host Controller >>> [    2.835974] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: new USB bus registered, >>> assigned bus number 1 >>> [    2.838276] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: debug port 2 >>> [    2.839700] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at >>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c:598 domain_get_iommu+0x55/0x60 >>> [    2.840671] Modules linked in: >>> [    2.840671] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted >>> 4.18.0-170.el8.kdump2.x86_64 #1 >>> [    2.840671] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 >>> Gen9, BIOS P89 07/21/2019 >>> [    2.840671] RIP: 0010:domain_get_iommu+0x55/0x60 >>> [    2.840671] Code: c2 01 eb 0b 48 83 c0 01 8b 34 87 85 f6 75 0b 48 >>> 63 c8 48 39 c2 75 ed 31 c0 c3 48 c1 e1 03 48 8b 05 70 f3 91 01 48 8b >>> 04 08 c3 <0f> 0b 31 c0 c3 31 c9 eb eb 66 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 55 40 >>> 0f b6 f6 >>> [    2.840671] RSP: 0018:ffffc900000dfab8 EFLAGS: 00010202 >>> [    2.840671] RAX: ffff88ec7f1c8000 RBX: 0000006c7c867000 RCX: >>> 0000000000000000 >>> [    2.840671] RDX: 00000000fffffff0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: >>> ffff88ec7f1c8000 >>> [    2.840671] RBP: ffff88ec6f7000b0 R08: ffff88ec7f19d000 R09: >>> ffff88ec7cbfcd00 >>> [    2.840671] R10: 0000000000000095 R11: ffffc900000df928 R12: >>> 0000000000000000 >>> [    2.840671] R13: ffff88ec7f1c8000 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: >>> 00000000ffffffff >>> [    2.840671] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88ec7f600000(0000) >>> knlGS:0000000000000000 >>> [    2.840671] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >>> [    2.840671] CR2: 00007ff3e1713000 CR3: 0000006c7de0a004 CR4: >>> 00000000001606b0 >>> [    2.840671] Call Trace: >>> [    2.840671]  __intel_map_single+0x62/0x140 >>> [    2.840671]  intel_alloc_coherent+0xa6/0x130 >>> [    2.840671]  dma_pool_alloc+0xd8/0x1e0 >>> [    2.840671]  e_qh_alloc+0x55/0x130 >>> [    2.840671]  ehci_setup+0x284/0x7b0 >>> [    2.840671]  ehci_pci_setup+0xa3/0x530 >>> [    2.840671]  usb_add_hcd+0x2b6/0x800 >>> [    2.840671]  usb_hcd_pci_probe+0x375/0x460 >>> [    2.840671]  local_pci_probe+0x41/0x90 >>> [    2.840671]  pci_device_probe+0x105/0x1b0 >>> [    2.840671]  driver_probe_device+0x12d/0x460 >>> [    2.840671]  device_driver_attach+0x50/0x60 >>> [    2.840671]  __driver_attach+0x61/0x130 >>> [    2.840671]  ? device_driver_attach+0x60/0x60 >>> [    2.840671]  bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xc0 >>> [    2.840671]  ? klist_add_tail+0x3b/0x70 >>> [    2.840671]  bus_add_driver+0x14d/0x1e0 >>> [    2.840671]  ? ehci_hcd_init+0xaa/0xaa >>> [    2.840671]  ? do_early_param+0x91/0x91 >>> [    2.840671]  driver_register+0x6b/0xb0 >>> [    2.840671]  ? ehci_hcd_init+0xaa/0xaa >>> [    2.840671]  do_one_initcall+0x46/0x1c3 >>> [    2.840671]  ? do_early_param+0x91/0x91 >>> [    2.840671]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1af/0x258 >>> [    2.840671]  ? rest_init+0xaa/0xaa >>> [    2.840671]  kernel_init+0xa/0xf9 >>> [    2.840671]  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 >>> [    2.840671] ---[ end trace e87b0d9a1c8135c4 ]--- >>> [    3.010848] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: Using iommu dma mapping >>> [    3.012551] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: 32bit DMA uses non-identity >>> mapping >>> [    3.018537] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: cache line size of 64 is not >>> supported >>> [    3.021188] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: irq 18, io mem 0x93002000 >>> [    3.029006] ehci-pci 0000:00:1a.0: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00 >>> [    3.030918] usb usb1: New USB device found, idVendor=1d6b, >>> idProduct=0002, bcdDevice= 4.18 >>> [    3.033491] usb usb1: New USB device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, >>> SerialNumber=1 >>> [    3.035900] usb usb1: Product: EHCI Host Controller >>> [    3.037423] usb usb1: Manufacturer: Linux >>> 4.18.0-170.el8.kdump2.x86_64 ehci_hcd >>> [    3.039691] usb usb1: SerialNumber: 0000:00:1a.0 >>> >>> It looks like the device finishes initializing once it figures out it >>> needs dma mapping instead of the default >>> passthrough. intel_alloc_coherent calls iommu_need_mapping, before it >>> calls __intel_map_single, so I'm not sure why it is tripping over the >>> WARN_ON in domain_get_iommu. >>> >>> one thing I noticed while looking at this is that domain_get_iommu can >>> return NULL. So should there be something like the following in >>> __intel_map_single after the domain_get_iommu call? >>> >>> if (!iommu) >>>  goto error; >>> >>> It is possible to deref the null pointer later otherwise. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jerry >> >> I reproduced the warning with a 5.5 kernel on an Intel NUC5i5MYBE. > > Hi Baolu, > > I think I understand what is happening here. With the kdump boot > translation is pre-enabled, so in intel_iommu_add_device things are > getting set to DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO. When intel_alloc_coherent > calls iommu_need_mapping it returns true, but doesn't do the dma > domain switch because of DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO. Then > __intel_map_single gets called and it calls deferred_attach_domain, > which sets the domain to the group domain, which in this case is the > identity domain. Then it calls domain_get_iommu, which spits out the > warning because the domain type was dma and returns null. My > workaround was to add a call to iommu_need_mapping and find_domain > after the deferred_attach_domain, but I don't know if that is the > correct solution. There are a couple other spots like intel_map_sg > that have the deferred_attach_domain after iommu_need_mapping that > possibly will suffer from the same problem. > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > index b5c5ab58d395..063f45323cfc 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > @@ -3515,6 +3515,10 @@ static dma_addr_t __intel_map_single(struct > device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr, >         if (!domain) >                 return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR; > > +       if (!iommu_need_mapping(dev)) > +               return paddr; > + > +       domain = find_domain(dev); >         iommu = domain_get_iommu(domain); >         size = aligned_nrpages(paddr, size); > > > I finally got a git repo over to one of these systems, and was > able to reproduce the issue with the head of linus's tree. With commit > 9235cb13d7d1 ("iommu/vt-d: Allow devices with RMRRs to use identity > domain") > there are more of the warnings, because devices are using identity that > weren't before. > Is it possible to move deferred domain attachment to identity_mapping()? diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index 9dc37672bf89..234ab346198e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c @@ -2913,13 +2913,11 @@ static int __init si_domain_init(int hw) static int identity_mapping(struct device *dev) { - struct device_domain_info *info; + struct dmar_domain *domain; - info = dev->archdata.iommu; - if (info && info != DUMMY_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO && info != DEFER_DEVICE_DOMAIN_INFO) - return (info->domain == si_domain); + domain = deferred_attach_domain(dev); - return 0; + return (!domain || domain_type_is_si(domain)); } static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev) Best regards, baolu