Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2796370ybv; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 07:38:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyvgBo1LzhMjFtcVUORjQIyukpw945BR+8HvUmqs42AdZswZA8YsJSFgQCDTva0pRNiYzwP X-Received: by 2002:aca:b60a:: with SMTP id g10mr7846631oif.102.1581262691727; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 07:38:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581262691; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HQa9djneNnctg+Xqanf4fw2/1IM0qiLYmL6OY6dWs7UDfOhwdIC9WhzE8BppVI5MVR Zn53zMuDgjun7EY/mRz8lEkaebzf7ZLDmvCY3oTD6jo659xibwciaGM1EfBoQBCu/7qO 7INxPkHP+cpE+ekACA4GxL/8o9gXc4DXE3nd1d6j9g1qdUxfvMD1VHmOSgovORTGt3jL 9oGJ+cgm0wWwpxzPb9U/4+6hI7osRheLFx5xX+Ozl6kx/O1aNOMvmG7K3MZJ7Xr7zpc+ xQm7sUgUIpF3gWjiLMQSKT5h0Gu6uKLlQXcMdthxdRVWwCErgiI0gnbeqX++lf1undh2 mVHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=88hVvRCUNq9kzQiy6MgKj2cgoBYaKf77VnGgGdPE8Qs=; b=sEfcyHanistEdxqcJ5lzSDsEyXU5wAUfdpyRwrmS7j5bCH36QjI/wPF1dmGQZZrb23 iTlo/0bxKsTnPC43hp/y5I1ztUaEkTmdqM/g7Fa8z3+j82LJ1nxS3323L7cCpPcbjS3p e3Y8esERs7XxE2S+tNu1BbznJPeC+9eacUwaYjX/IFrGV+GGxsaixlq2IImnUbgXAlvE xWfTTDMMTN6e7HJ05XmOJP5WOdnzNGdJ08FiKb+TuVoHwgYXhWDf68lvzw0yWwbnQjNW +U3EwCUvRAWLS7X0q8xCOfq/pLjU3APd4OCoB0AdkTMzGZUoci3NqmvAH3LxyJjgbNLE Y73A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s143si6891609oih.251.2020.02.09.07.37.59; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 07:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727771AbgBIPhs (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 10:37:48 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:42502 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727661AbgBIPhs (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 10:37:48 -0500 Received: from p5b06da22.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.6.218.34] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j0oeO-00053e-Kc; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 16:37:36 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAB4D100F5A; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 16:37:35 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: sean.v.kelley@linux.intel.com, Kar Hin Ong , Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-rt-users , LKML , "x86\@kernel.org" , "linux-pci\@vger.kernel.org" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , Julia Cartwright , Keng Soon Cheah , Gratian Crisan , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: RE: Re: "oneshot" interrupt causes another interrupt to be fired erroneously in Haswell system In-Reply-To: <87muaetj4p.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> References: <20191031230532.GA170712@google.com> <87a76oxqv1.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87muanwwhb.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <8f1e5981b519acb5edf53b5392c81ef7cbf6a3eb.camel@linux.intel.com> <87muaetj4p.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 16:37:35 +0100 Message-ID: <8736bjlqkg.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sean, Thomas Gleixner writes: > Sean V Kelley writes: >> So I will ensure we actually create useful information pointing to this >> behavior either in kernel docs or online as in a white paper or both. > > Great. > >>> As we have already quirks in drivers/pci/quirks.c which handle the >>> same issue on older chipsets, we really should add one for these kind >>> of systems to avoid fiddling with the BIOS (which you can, but most >>> people cannot). > >> Agreed, and I will follow-up with Kar Hin Ong to get them added. > > Much appreciated. Any update on this? Thanks, tglx