Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3028526ybv; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:27:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywLFZLFP2xuxWWiVBFJep3sFmH837j0acw7iSiQYG2z9+04mQeaVTvhlqmkK4Qi+Lagdbd X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b0a:: with SMTP id i10mr8903558oik.137.1581283628358; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 13:27:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581283628; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qrM6mmeEXRELbVifcnt7axTWzqOFo2Enh7DNbrCVy/lvgSKugMA4G5OLSth3BTrUJz sn7nvsk5yX+PVL8fEN5hDui7PFsT8Nl/VA7Ft+dVSKK9VLRbb55Y0tgnL8rsc1yhE/Zc sNsPo59zel4rIDkBCmuJ5Zy5CLcYrW+8whTUoE1fy7SwXYymXxTB+4An5Dyl5bLlk9WI XJIm/0RBS4i6ZbNr6hMsY8jLzRHpSfrkHnOd5FoIAcrYjEIreNwpznsyDyJyVBmhTIDq paOweZybw8OwdbCSq/lEZRzcgmIxSu2SGXp9upfursv+xvglfaZNbHZmZ47bh4GqX8W6 wQkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=wEFj1G1NKftjgGPLShAKJwX/yS+125NZdJR3n/IjoD0=; b=g7yw+Ko2R96MpXPkuqZ02eSIyMaJIPh9O87+xvhHkR/S1j8Esretcn+G4j3oa19C2s hI4OoovAGSe4zM4GTv6ZbsZnrwS9dvHbw1MyQQDIR1XDeTgeM3afSX6ieP7Dex8e38WX gf1hI1AhVkaVhp/rehdvqGVFKfPAQzMPs0SuTJFnubZ9xPDzfhyWfs9vObE9V7uKPo2o +IrRAEbfrPM7g595u0XpthcdaSt8a+vXitVjtqNbZK0G/RmCiLQ/hPO7d59PdIz0d2MG gQLWJR7klSvGinP0gKBsusBZNAKHN1LlpX1ovq21FcTFEzgNdIgJZ36X2eZPdUjgxQdj bALg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y8si3568732otg.309.2020.02.09.13.26.57; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 13:27:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727962AbgBIV0f (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 16:26:35 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:49722 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727682AbgBIV0f (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 16:26:35 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2020 13:26:34 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,422,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="405398627" Received: from jradtke-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.22.75]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2020 13:26:29 -0800 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kai.svahn@intel.com, bp@alien8.de, josh@joshtriplett.org, luto@kernel.org, kai.huang@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, puiterwijk@redhat.com, Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: [PATCH v26 03/22] x86/mm: x86/sgx: Signal SIGSEGV with PF_SGX Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 23:25:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20200209212609.7928-4-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200209212609.7928-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> References: <20200209212609.7928-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Sean Christopherson Include SGX bit to the PF error codes and throw SIGSEGV with PF_SGX when a #PF with SGX set happens. CPU throws a #PF with the SGX bit in the event of Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM) conflict. The EPCM is a CPU-internal table, which describes the properties for a enclave page. Enclaves are measured and signed software entities, which SGX hosts. [1] Although the primary purpose of the EPCM conflict checks is to prevent malicious accesses to an enclave, an illegit access can happen also for legit reasons. All SGX reserved memory, including EPCM is encrypted with a transient key that does not survive from the power transition. Throwing a SIGSEGV allows user space software react when this happens (e.g. rec-create the enclave, which was invalidated). [1] Intel SDM: 36.5.1 Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM) Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h | 1 + arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h index ffa0dc8a535e..bb8d5ae74dbc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/traps.h @@ -174,5 +174,6 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code { X86_PF_RSVD = 1 << 3, X86_PF_INSTR = 1 << 4, X86_PF_PK = 1 << 5, + X86_PF_SGX = 1 << 15, }; #endif /* _ASM_X86_TRAPS_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c index fa4ea09593ab..dee9504cde79 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c @@ -1179,6 +1179,19 @@ access_error(unsigned long error_code, struct vm_area_struct *vma) if (error_code & X86_PF_PK) return 1; + /* + * Access is blocked by the Enclave Page Cache Map (EPCM), i.e. the + * access is allowed by the PTE but not the EPCM. This usually happens + * when the EPCM is yanked out from under us, e.g. by hardware after a + * suspend/resume cycle. In any case, software, i.e. the kernel, can't + * fix the source of the fault as the EPCM can't be directly modified by + * software. Handle the fault as an access error in order to signal + * userspace so that userspace can rebuild their enclave(s), even though + * userspace may not have actually violated access permissions. + */ + if (unlikely(error_code & X86_PF_SGX)) + return 1; + /* * Make sure to check the VMA so that we do not perform * faults just to hit a X86_PF_PK as soon as we fill in a -- 2.20.1