Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3374332ybv; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 22:03:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwh+3nUn/r6hk+9E4e86WxnuWzvKr9qbuCeDoGKnEXgJhoI/+V/3xGCCP3nnZ9G66JFmyiN X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:50:: with SMTP id d16mr9147875otp.166.1581314611494; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 22:03:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581314611; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kw/RTUrO0Ps4f3qGI2onWs6MCSdpH9HvAdQHh4hlSC5Tnmat9gVPot0MP7KC/Ad50y 1b1ECR1Tv48zzn7LqM0IFzH8HnBUvBy05JC0JcAKbXcFcrCTgCosoaFRtM6kho2dBBRm 6Ly9El9rIC5d0iuFaqcF2ApRvMPYKLJbbgMDhdjGSt1Z0C7ckveCG/tlKa2cxwyoj6nb LqJTHc8z9gOxC2n1U/REiRAw8Cl8MctCMlVHr+VURmp7opXCdVQTWgx5UfUgiO0nasTu 1n0Q3S8t3BsftbjLbncshmwOXPMjDHNF9PLQ9sShWVBVsYoYtr5cX1EsX65bGxYs8RKc w5Bg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=yAN15nBQGBksP5kipKqWMHks/znX9dlCX16KxuX0PKM=; b=sAn3P0xfma4+3BzQ59RPWDxEn6IRZp83muOZkLE3ZERQ9fUZdEPehKsrHZpsgb/uop nD83OGGepqIMCS2EAv5+9RWiAhxCBTMEq1Vkugk7Qesqr86id6IoQCNmBnNQ3IFca2h6 o7JPrD3ApvmTpL/mXyAGVxj3fq+jdHaa/cpWvDrDRkzO0venoCXJYDchP1YLB5UW6jYX G6wVpDmp6e37ZEBjHG8tVRBvzmMagDonrXzU/NQyvg3FuxAesUy6AjjNTP4yrz43RTax AH0yTej9TKos6x4fCn2V+M5jTofSvTfHKuQv8n+UfvLGu0o1uKQghlbSFh8FMdVNKaCv ihAA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r26si4206553otk.79.2020.02.09.22.03.15; Sun, 09 Feb 2020 22:03:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727194AbgBJGCj (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:02:39 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:7451 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726103AbgBJGCi (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:02:38 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2020 22:02:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,424,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="405480581" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2020 22:02:36 -0800 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:02:53 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Baoquan He Cc: Wei Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection_map() Message-ID: <20200210060253.GE7326@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20200209104826.3385-1-bhe@redhat.com> <20200209104826.3385-3-bhe@redhat.com> <20200209230713.GB7326@richard> <20200210033627.GZ8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200210033627.GZ8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:36:27AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >On 02/10/20 at 07:07am, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >> >Wrap the codes clearing subsection map of one memory region in >> >section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map(). >> > >> >> Patch 1 and 2 server the same purpose -- to #ifdef the VMEMMAP. > >Hmm, I didn't say patch 1 and 2 are preparation works because they had >better be done even if we don't take off subsection map from >SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case. Wrapping the subsection map filling and clearing >codes into separate new functions, can make section_activate() and >section_deactivate() much clearer on code logic. > >If you don't mind, I will keep them for now, and see what other people >will say. No objection. > >Thanks >Baoquan > >> >> >--- >> > mm/sparse.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> > >> >diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c >> >index 9ad741ccbeb6..696f6b9f706e 100644 >> >--- a/mm/sparse.c >> >+++ b/mm/sparse.c >> >@@ -726,14 +726,25 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap) >> > } >> > #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */ >> > >> >-static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, >> >- struct vmem_altmap *altmap) >> >+/** >> >+ * clear_subsection_map - Clear subsection map of one memory region >> >+ * >> >+ * @pfn - start pfn of the memory range >> >+ * @nr_pages - number of pfns to add in the region >> >+ * >> >+ * This is only intended for hotplug, and clear the related subsection >> >+ * map inside one section. >> >+ * >> >+ * Return: >> >+ * * -EINVAL - Section already deactived. >> >+ * * 0 - Subsection map is emptied. >> >+ * * 1 - Subsection map is not empty. >> >+ */ >> >+static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages) >> > { >> > DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 }; >> > DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 }; >> > struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn); >> >- bool section_is_early = early_section(ms); >> >- struct page *memmap = NULL; >> > unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage >> > ? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL; >> > >> >@@ -744,8 +755,28 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, >> > if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION), >> > "section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n", >> > pfn, nr_pages)) >> >- return; >> >+ return -EINVAL; >> >+ >> >+ bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION); >> > >> >+ if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)) >> >+ return 0; >> >+ >> >+ return 1; >> >+} >> >+ >> >+static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, >> >+ struct vmem_altmap *altmap) >> >+{ >> >+ struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn); >> >+ bool section_is_early = early_section(ms); >> >+ struct page *memmap = NULL; >> >+ int rc; >> >+ >> >+ >> >+ rc = clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages); >> >+ if(IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)rc)) >> >+ return; >> > /* >> > * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations >> > * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}): >> >@@ -763,8 +794,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages, >> > * >> > * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified >> > */ >> >- bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION); >> >- if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)) { >> >+ if (!rc) { >> > unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn); >> > >> > /* >> >-- >> >2.17.2 >> >> -- >> Wei Yang >> Help you, Help me >> -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me