Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:44:10 +0100
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20200209215916.15640598689d3e40aa3f9e72@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20200203205907.291929-1-rpenyaev@suse.de> <51f29f23a4d996810bfad12b9634ee12@suse.de> <20200204083237.7fa30aea@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <549916868753e737316f509640550b66@suse.de> <20200209215916.15640598689d3e40aa3f9e72@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
CC:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Christopher Kohlhoff <chris.kohlhoff@clearpool.io>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Max_Neunh=F6ffer?= <max@arangodb.com>
Message-ID: <96BB34B1-0544-4CB4-A93C-62646753B46F@arangodb.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Dear Andrew and all,
Sorry, I did not understand that I should explicitly give consent=2E
This is fine with me=2E
Cheers
  Max

Am 10=2E Februar 2020 06:59:16 MEZ schrieb Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-found=
ation=2Eorg>:
>On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100 Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse=2Ede>
>wrote:
>
>> On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >>=20
>> >> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag,
>> >> or reference to the bug is enough?
>> >=20
>> > Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag
>to
>> > fully credit the extra work done by the reporter=2E
>>=20
>> Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb=2Ecom>
>> Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer <max@arangodb=2Ecom>
>>=20
>> Correct?
>
>We could do that, but preferably with Max's approval (please?)=2E
>
>Because people sometimes have issues with having their personal info
>added to the kernel commit record without having being asked=2E