Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3539768ybv; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:44:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxrxn+GR90rMj6mnpM7oh4EDAI2yeSWMS347663BoFOrm1rYs6o6c5jSwwddUQpVGx144IQ X-Received: by 2002:a54:4895:: with SMTP id r21mr293637oic.107.1581327857034; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:44:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581327857; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rT2hbtlxC+/CCjKZNxMQDz7D5GyBhxJ0KOlrHAebMoDtczF8/gtU6LeLUs1J0p4Q6Y LgU/CzY+VkX3Ik10UJWEZwVdwDXtdMuSHWWmLFUB8Pj748Y+Tz/3RvDUhnbgYRuJXDhF hknx0lcavNukw8g0JA8WtK0VIyE1SkITkUT/IaweZPZWOqWkd1ehdIgLqtllBG/z6qNP 2f86Njhr7VxPz4GPoUXB6804lJk4jpQhbFMyYtDrtfX7iwmrhz9aoctk8VkRpIAXSz+i d+QcDVOo8/RNq8FBrw0dGpVhOydG60Ikqz11U5+srNJz/sWBZVjTgkCbIBWgJCf9aoPX VhWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=x9SV3A4BI2DeQjJFO0ae9STyzPEY9wqQbjKRsnD1NDw=; b=HhnIWWjBzwlr5BXfUiuLlo+H3/JxVtV9Pe/Pi5wFKdnT5ISrUTeeU22s5L0qOGp8h1 715PqrucBn+kp3iXhVPIrM+7ZRRWA0wxAFlZ7t2EgXlxZrozrjTmakw9GMa0lHxxHZSz tSyYAj+3dvYKrLPDh7Y1Bz4aIn8su6maVQ9R+u4k0OzoBG2qs62UNV/iXoFMKSSsABXk wrDTaDa2CNi4G9D8S4UZSvjsbrliXvbpCMAmns1AVJl0UDWbhiIeFa7OwOCU67FBRh9I kn6rFHjKoKB9I1PMJYxNQj8oSlhRsw6h+uJptgJFU7oY0Ca36Y0+qMg5GyExj0Iqt7t/ TsdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si7854742oip.248.2020.02.10.01.44.05; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 01:44:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727437AbgBJJny (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:43:54 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52842 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726950AbgBJJny (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:43:54 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D776B15D; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:43:47 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:43:47 +0100 From: Roman Penyaev To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Max Neunhoeffer , Christopher Kohlhoff , Davidlohr Bueso , Jason Baron , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] epoll: fix possible lost wakeup on epoll_ctl() path In-Reply-To: <20200209215916.15640598689d3e40aa3f9e72@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200203205907.291929-1-rpenyaev@suse.de> <51f29f23a4d996810bfad12b9634ee12@suse.de> <20200204083237.7fa30aea@cakuba.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <549916868753e737316f509640550b66@suse.de> <20200209215916.15640598689d3e40aa3f9e72@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: <55c054e4c52c1e659cfa5f38a5e37571@suse.de> X-Sender: rpenyaev@suse.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-02-10 06:59, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:20:03 +0100 Roman Penyaev > wrote: > >> On 2020-02-04 17:32, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> > On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:41:42 +0100, Roman Penyaev wrote: >> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> >> >> Could you please suggest me, do I need to include Reported-by tag, >> >> or reference to the bug is enough? >> > >> > Sorry to jump in but FWIW I like the Reported-and-bisected-by tag to >> > fully credit the extra work done by the reporter. >> >> Reported-by: Max Neunhoeffer >> Bisected-by: Max Neunhoeffer >> >> Correct? > > We could do that, but preferably with Max's approval (please?). > > Because people sometimes have issues with having their personal info > added to the kernel commit record without having being asked. Max approved. I've just resent v2, no code changes, comment tweaks and 2 explicit tags with Max's name. -- Roman