Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:59:56 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen
Message-ID: <20200210095956.GA15056@willie-the-truck>
References: <20200123153341.19947-1-will@kernel.org>
 <CAHk-=wjC2EDquO8_kzc-FHOGGjgODOLKjswYGJAMh58zTkyX3w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200124083307.GA14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAK7LNAS=er+Vkvx+vurYMCHS2u1_Vj0zV+tvUzDkSwop3XP1gg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNAS=er+Vkvx+vurYMCHS2u1_Vj0zV+tvUzDkSwop3XP1gg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:50:53PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:33 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:59:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 7:33 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is version two of the patches I previously posted as an RFC here:
> > >
> > > Looks fine to me, as far as I can tell,
> >
> > Awesome, I've picked them up with a target for tip/locking/core.
> 
> Were they really picked up?
> 
> The MW is closed now, but I do not them in Linus' tree.
> I do not see them even in linux-next.

We ended up running into build issues with m68k which took quite a bit of
effort to fix, so that meant we missed the merge window. It also seems that
we've now run into similar looking issues for sparc32 :(

Will