Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3662941ybv; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:15:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzF/pa9SjsH0+9j6ydlFQgh8NZJckvudmJwE5tDW+bV8JAjVhEXOXwSNCkRapMAdJvwPTMD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1149:: with SMTP id x9mr873077otq.156.1581336927621; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:15:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581336927; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EQPtN3Ss+29RQOuNV7aWRCn/3tuZ6plVTWQx95AmdIbEj5yNzC8jnv9y+9s1kMWWY5 X7bOTbGYgS679f5b7bed3tewg/HpoHYuArtNyh05nugiUVOSmEDNgWbvsii61rlx+B8B HUPZJr6JW0zlQwoRfVNvEE42BvbAXOZw5vd8CfWDUqDciCsww9uMI2cM2pWehzKuoQjK COeSSkvQ2aa23pdeRGeCMlJBCU6SzT39eRBZLIBfmE/JlJtGEhvtKcYLkygFJjhonb66 adHEorssFQPT2x/NpqRFifbErATrLKHe15HoOJBZmMVtpFDmZnKfwSSZ88EnUMC2tj0+ 7+3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=SLpBExsKZLtK2SHmY9lMw5K33/QC+xtpwOOSBm+kc1I=; b=bkn+P/Hwp+CITYjQ+TFRbhSiomeV83m2twZ4+nrXW/2aj4j6umeNgEwi6klVFG93D1 uSZcarZmXrZ1ynwHgqvd53Pxx5o0yUh9z62QCdIuIzKHEhh8AqYfbl/syh3yV2ckma9I NNE2aCvW8KoIw50Fmm2SfstBmhICxtyrF8Qwis609Aeu/gneAlNtB/ZXBQ6G/5u93FOf L+A7QdEcaSWuLA9uwzK5/ROkGydiVjJ7VNGvAnOiznDBecFQ43vj0VCW+g4lyENzJENA ItS8L6zb16SKFIJbAGczSx6noxCpzAMvizlMhCVyUICD9tLX6ThfwnH+6y2qWCELatUS FRJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=vfsnzG50; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f9si126652oti.44.2020.02.10.04.15.15; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 04:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=vfsnzG50; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727499AbgBJMPE (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:15:04 -0500 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:43474 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727029AbgBJMPE (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:15:04 -0500 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01ACEsrX098789; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:14:54 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1581336894; bh=SLpBExsKZLtK2SHmY9lMw5K33/QC+xtpwOOSBm+kc1I=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=vfsnzG50PyID/eSEXaNAjwpZk6RY2mHtR19qpsQxppBrTL5S0M5G5L/DcLYs2rah7 v9wCswU+oLzVr8BfI30suD2f2+OiSRffhtL48F2uBkmwO1NJrbgskx2wvIrkKFOiNO yTUo8bRNk4UJmJJiWGGXVM7gCfWFPmlxgINzbFYA= Received: from DLEE115.ent.ti.com (dlee115.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.26]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 01ACEsmo062021 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:14:54 -0600 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE115.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:14:53 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1847.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:14:54 -0600 Received: from [10.24.69.159] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 01ACEp0N103304; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:14:52 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: core: Add consumer device link support To: Alexandre Torgue , youling 257 CC: , , , , References: <20191104143713.11137-1-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <20200206133918.15012-1-youling257@gmail.com> <0c4a37a9-0a2e-e698-f423-53060854ea05@ti.com> <8bd72269-16ae-b24a-7144-44d22d668dc6@ti.com> <1cd5885d-7db4-59b9-ef2d-e3556f60ca68@st.com> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:48:26 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1cd5885d-7db4-59b9-ef2d-e3556f60ca68@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/02/20 5:00 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On 2/10/20 9:08 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Alexandre, >> >> On 07/02/20 12:27 PM, youling 257 wrote: >>> test this diff, dwc3 work for my device, thanks. >>> >>> 2020-02-07 13:16 GMT+08:00, Kishon Vijay Abraham I : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 06/02/20 7:09 PM, youling257 wrote: >>>>> This patch cause "dwc3 dwc3.3.auto: failed to create device link to >>>>> dwc3.3.auto.ulpi" problem. >>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206435 >>>> >>>> I'm suspecting there is some sort of reverse dependency with dwc3 ULPI. >>>> Can you try the following diff? >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c >>>> index 2eb28cc2d2dc..397311dcb116 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c >>>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, const char >>>> *string) >>>> >>>>          get_device(&phy->dev); >>>> >>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); >>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, >>>> DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY); >>>>          if (!link) { >>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n", >>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent)); >>>> @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get(struct device *dev, >>>> struct device_node *np, >>>>                  return phy; >>>>          } >>>> >>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); >>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, >>>> DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY); >>>>          if (!link) { >>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n", >>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent)); >>>> @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ struct phy *devm_of_phy_get_by_index(struct device >>>> *dev, struct device_node *np, >>>>          *ptr = phy; >>>>          devres_add(dev, ptr); >>>> >>>> -       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, DL_FLAG_STATELESS); >>>> +       link = device_link_add(dev, &phy->dev, >>>> DL_FLAG_SYNC_STATE_ONLY); >>>>          if (!link) { >>>>                  dev_err(dev, "failed to create device link to %s\n", >>>>                          dev_name(phy->dev.parent));Parent >> >> Can you check if this doesn't affect the suspend/resume ordering? > > With this fix, suspend/resume ordering is broken on my side. What do you > think to keep the STATELESS flag and to only display a warn if > "device_link_add" returns an error ? It's not "smart" but it could > solved our issue. yeah, that sounds reasonable for now. Can you find out the dependencies between dwc3 and ulpi and what exactly breaks. That would help Saravana to suggest a fix? > > As a lot of improvements have been recently done on device link topic by > Saravana, we could check with him what is the way to follow. Thanks Kishon