Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964799AbWBGByA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:54:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932432AbWBGByA (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:54:00 -0500 Received: from s2.yuriev.com ([69.31.8.140]:34722 "HELO s2.yuriev.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932186AbWBGBx7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:53:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:51:26 -0500 From: alex-lists-linux-kernel@yuriev.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: non-fakeraid controllers Message-ID: <20060207015126.GA12236@s2.yuriev.com> Reply-To: alex-lists-linux-kernel@yuriev.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 19 Hi, This is not an attempt to start a religious flamewar about what is RAID vs. what is softraid vs. what is fakeraid. Does anyone has a list/refence/etc on reasonably modern SCSI controllers (at least u160) in a non-fakeraid way i.e. the way that would allow linux to boot from a RAID protected disk array when one of the drives in the array failed even if the root filesystem is located on the same array? Thanks, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/