Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4149472ybv; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz56+Ievey7+0XyQsAOazEVIwZyGtjgHyDnnE5alNTzn7LozE8mfjBFW4OzXM65A6QQa+e0 X-Received: by 2002:aca:48cd:: with SMTP id v196mr778180oia.102.1581369716292; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581369716; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V8pssri1QUwZDUxjUnt/R75fp4Pox3JEJbL8SNINuEUOgUwicKFsaFazIHFl9HzzPF bEaFXaMxY+1mG/ltFBm1wGOm5n2EhE/9y2kx5X6NHi5TIQI3T8qUioH+gMUYGdDTjd1l dATiVuWc6KzeDgP0oevLvm+M9ZzpFWkDtxxcowLfBhSHo/i/JMN04p4YJQptdSf9Fujf 51yrSR0uQRBC4A1xuzndQaUbg0V5gX2LUApQlMU12j+j0aIvueOVA8/3wolY3gjTHvCL 0aqGNHMiqB8GCweGHpwFemOHbt0vqEYw/b5Siw5Hpwrm5h4xtV611T0xtk+Ysi+gygHm M33g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=xoubVLLqrUMwwq8k9aqhgPs8ugNxz2VRM04t0KZe/tw=; b=U/arV8Jlf7are1817NlhXxDR0NDpptatjH3at2GoQbLMayveDOPrgoEeSVw/pPsoY9 jwwJDeDelbTOyGHjy0Odd3HCt9abKyOgAlYZcQpmOJwGfCPMPPpnfNtuvkSPBYHVO1/M /Myi8WcIbQ5/v1cVcLUBnTO1x20wsa/5jpvodTQJt7NYVer8NwH97ml8ADXgwytpxisT +aYa3ec2cdGnYYZ17zANqEhKDgdTAAXkgvnTI7jdAw0ZTcx/RAAVHmAHIqpkfY0WQF/m T/9okkszVpMf8kINRON3yHWiCwjhjYyCSsRAhOAeV+QuORDWr4CdgQBooZEcd6k8q6K2 XYNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="HpRF/mqf"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b18si785131otp.17.2020.02.10.13.21.41; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b="HpRF/mqf"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727411AbgBJVVd (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:21:33 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f67.google.com ([209.85.167.67]:35413 "EHLO mail-lf1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727003AbgBJVVd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 16:21:33 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f67.google.com with SMTP id z18so5378129lfe.2 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xoubVLLqrUMwwq8k9aqhgPs8ugNxz2VRM04t0KZe/tw=; b=HpRF/mqfbtil9oUJ3RB70VAfErIXF960JdgkqsDsXxma5cIFU92TRKurk5LAEAbSc9 y9AAaLekoC6hn4UybtCCJkMPziOR/DGOehXh8rMPf55B/bx5kPIgzs1QIhLr62haHtff Bwb8NQXOb/Rf7GH0LdzyXkXdPGblCfcZzec0Qn0oZ22v+/PSrVjMxK2V4SvC4pTCXLqF bzuK0OlLg22o+yTRPin9m0MNdf7em/ngNODGoq2DNxruj8WTjNkBzBa7BqGaAAphjFOm d0h99P2mdadzMGQqQDWs/BAfwoqwBdI8fWZ9zLX5dZwPy82US7qXyo5rlxho1QVvZaR3 QxUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=xoubVLLqrUMwwq8k9aqhgPs8ugNxz2VRM04t0KZe/tw=; b=MtEgtJdwvbi/6agoTF1zGfUl9nPJj8hBccJBuTpBLSzw3d2+QvYZDqx3iBx2u5t4Ej h36p3tHyk9ZgHsaiUvkkj0WY/Y8bGhKdHyWAXiR/p/lghJIXNtbtBjKABah3mo1Y43QM P26DBIFF2gCDUKTMHO+y8ctjqYBrJyKFTO4Mzf5c+0dO/HOjAmI/dBIYarDDV2Bhio/m oTnd0TTVduwVyInQLh5ZsKMK7KLQ5uE28d76CBt15vRJaJI8/ohsBmilLqwVP/oHGNeF HAC9SnSxdQbeCglCvLAdXmOLZbKAPckBoGCQPE8eUb9p85+UBbmRopw6o6UPx+8N69bf BbwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW8z2slWYnm4b+cKUhPdiuEbnO7C9YEuXLlc1YD57L+PBbcEQJF w2AI+dW0wu5JlLl831rvuNSpebP4vdA= X-Received: by 2002:a19:8b88:: with SMTP id n130mr1735071lfd.210.1581369691703; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm685208lfl.51.2020.02.10.13.21.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 13:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 64293100D30; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:21:49 +0300 (+03) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:21:49 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Qian Cai Cc: Matthew Wilcox , akpm@linux-foundation.org, elver@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/filemap: fix a data race in filemap_fault() Message-ID: <20200210212149.u6zlpi2jefi2vkfg@box> References: <1581354029-20154-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw> <20200210172511.GL8731@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200210180546.vt7yhdjav5oinij7@box> <1581364697.7365.45.camel@lca.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1581364697.7365.45.camel@lca.pw> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 02:58:17PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 21:05 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 09:25:11AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:00:29PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote: > > > > @@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ void filemap_map_pages(struct vm_fault *vmf, > > > > if (page->index >= max_idx) > > > > goto unlock; > > > > > > > > - if (file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0) > > > > + if (data_race(file->f_ra.mmap_miss > 0)) > > > > file->f_ra.mmap_miss--; > > > > > > How is this safe? Two threads can each see 1, and then both decrement the > > > in-memory copy, causing it to end up at -1. > > > > Right, it is bogus. > > > > Below is my completely untested attempt on fix this. It still allows > > races, but they will only lead to missed accounting, but not underflow. > > Looks good to me. Do you plan to send out an official patch? Feel free to submit it. After testing. -- Kirill A. Shutemov