Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:21:18 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc:     Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
        Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>, keith.busch@intel.com,
        Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
        Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: pciehp: Make sure pciehp_isr clears interrupt
 events
Message-ID: <20200210232118.GA82108@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200209125543.k7u5y6omptbpmwo6@wunner.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:55:43PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:51:51PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> > I see that Lukas took a look at this earlier; I'd really like to have
> > his reviewed-by, since he's the expert on this code.
> 
> Hm, should we add an entry for pciehp to MAINTAINERS and list me as R: or M:?

That'd be great.  I would certainly apply a patch like that, but I don't
want to presume by generating it myself.

Bjorn