Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932443AbWBGDNk (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:13:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932445AbWBGDNk (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:13:40 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:64923 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932443AbWBGDNj (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:13:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) From: Lee Revell To: Jim Crilly Cc: Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Nigel Cunningham , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060207030129.GA23860@mail> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1139251682.2791.290.camel@mindpipe> <200602070625.49479.nigel@suspend2.net> <200602070051.41448.rjw@sisk.pl> <20060207003713.GB31153@voodoo> <20060207004611.GD1575@elf.ucw.cz> <20060207005930.GD31153@voodoo> <1139275143.2041.24.camel@mindpipe> <20060207030129.GA23860@mail> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 22:13:36 -0500 Message-Id: <1139282017.2041.44.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1322 Lines: 29 On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > On 02/06/06 08:19:02PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 19:59 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > > > I guess reasonable is a subjective term. For instance, I've seen quite > > > a few people vehemently against adding new ioctls to the kernel and > > > yet you'll be adding quite a few for /dev/snapshot. I'm just of the > > > same mind as Nigel in that it makes the most sense to me that the > > > majority of the suspend/hibernation process to be in the kernel. > > > > No one is saying that ANY new ioctls are bad, just that the KISS > > principle of engineering dictates that it's bad design to use ioctls > > where a simple read/write to a sysfs file will do. > > > > I understand that, but shouldn't the KISS principle also be applied to > the user interface of a feature? Personally I agree with you on suspend2, I think this is something that needed to Just Work yesterday, and every day it doesn't work we are losing users... but who am I to talk, I'm not the one who will have to maintain it. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/