Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4528540ybv; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:48:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxn/38xiKFi2xdpM4DJ7azl/02zTLNjVsF3KAIPLQiIDa330wUzVtEjt4FGK8Tr3YjnRvsq X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1042:: with SMTP id b2mr3935582otp.306.1581400132744; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:48:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581400132; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ma3/hFm1Z+rQMtNUJzx+zksFanYrmMSodKX9d0LPYTDrE/w9oo2VuZogD73cOg0/gl GXTTbeUkxa6exiSKLeTtm/UiqLSG15QSkycJSFkJVUkwhG1riLzpqrWRc0cx9uDZmK2M 1xVwJI6yVZtDZBAv4aTNdkD+mfTCxRO4XJMZLyF9Rz92pOmMqfqS2Ozketyi+SAyHwLf 5jIzfvw1NDkasZIjTgEJez2ahiCSN3/5sGqMm9xy7fdjV0kafS8cQfPhHFvQGmKjQV6t 60elvYAM/Y0/jiMcpzJtAJ20PnmnotWKqPJseu75+XsjyPtQBBV93/V0Lkbt9yhotYnw rrIA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=V9KO1k9P8J3nM1/EjQwGBTH9H+54xdTL4UiNZzfIiIA=; b=CE5Hdlxg/lKzCB6uXu+iNcTRFwC1pexDhe869NoqCHn1ZLUzh0aa/73kvTmt6JDlzG SNnFEr/Oh8TS9Q5GoZVmMFXWfa/8QVmQrsdWKaIiZCAVpJpSQcMOp0G2TgGx/m+gfz15 36CwZIjor0fk8xcbXa+8o8kK+BlRTXRsPhRBfd6q/AelwANOHDyB3DEIUBUeLokuTRpA ndaSV7A/wd7yopSnqKiVLmQWznHMv5DlcBQCUPU/kuF7m+Dbv1emYdFJ4SzrnAA7R43Q M4+aAA71/9QA8fOPGy2/VoLE299ydFzFqgAilkvPpOaps6pEDTSgP4XoB6N9wwJl3d+x YoDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="LDfCTC/a"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s17si1451354otd.76.2020.02.10.21.48.41; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:48:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b="LDfCTC/a"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728057AbgBKEZm (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:25:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:36515 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727481AbgBKEZl (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 23:25:41 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id a6so3718947plm.3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:25:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V9KO1k9P8J3nM1/EjQwGBTH9H+54xdTL4UiNZzfIiIA=; b=LDfCTC/a9lACRyt/I8wPrZgYqbnFBRGBC5bGiEZv10ocg2VsnYAr/7t/zbq+YwiAle xPrpWdEcKjufQEEVPSNMwdgqXPCt9h3S1gFC7Rcjs7rT68Fi+uv1XwuowH2lTQPWQX3J bCSOpoaxOwtvKXSTQ51u526lKJIK0yxRPnduJzb+SlZX0dbLQCVyn7SXXdlmnxeDetLK 9tiDXrKwPxX2gA2VGfnTQfNLupM7uerPtbOQePIlF6d+S1XnL9aV3U6K4iDC5Yz1Hawu NRc+GoPxqFIndLVJe5E9HuoYCphp7G/N8Vyfd4lGitbbf5V4u6X1nsFzCavInLlp2irW fI8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=V9KO1k9P8J3nM1/EjQwGBTH9H+54xdTL4UiNZzfIiIA=; b=CLC2DERIVvR2XHLvmVGMSoYDv8JJnpvqs0hxV1t0jCuF9WEzhyoD/EYP/0rTdUb4xU VoKY+mBELsPUE65GUcQ496Cut7hrV2gFshhZPcRKoxi5Z6LhusN/py5GTYCXpKj0Tasg YQ+tHJdb+CBCr+M+RwFmu5Z9hORjcoxzy9xqb/9N1QcitfQP+MKBdfXVSGpXDU/8Kykm M7wX8bppLcN6qgAeuCeCTwEMNMzyrX5PcOxcIyTNYWWbqQQVI50bx84svRUQfuoMTndf pCqKdaK8wYGTC32fLM6x1dorZwEYOkx7YZlBQ0QMOL7vXMLnj4Eam2fNCHYL8eY2tg7u WLbw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXqsRoub2SIBparc+mSm7PlewbXgNNiaXDFS2g6jKZHxHAv5srK xBaMtaYO3Rf6BJOrWREiiifgBHmG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:61:: with SMTP id 88mr1341669pla.17.1581395139532; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:1:3e01:2939:5992:52da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm1639684pgz.88.2020.02.10.20.25.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:25:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 20:25:36 -0800 From: Minchan Kim To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Josef Bacik , Johannes Weiner , Jan Kara , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix long time stall from mm_populate Message-ID: <20200211042536.GB242563@google.com> References: <20200211001958.170261-1-minchan@kernel.org> <20200211011021.GP8731@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200211035004.GA242563@google.com> <20200211035412.GR8731@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200211035412.GR8731@bombadil.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 07:54:12PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 07:50:04PM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:10:21PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 04:19:58PM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > filemap_fault > > > > find a page form page(PG_uptodate|PG_readahead|PG_writeback) > > > > > > Uh ... That shouldn't be possible. > > > > Please see shrink_page_list. Vmscan uses PG_reclaim to accelerate > > page reclaim when the writeback is done so the page will have both > > flags at the same time and the PG reclaim could be regarded as > > PG_readahead in fault conext. > > What part of fault context can make that mistake? The snippet I quoted > below is from page_cache_async_readahead() where it will clearly not > make that mistake. There's a lot of code here; please don't presume I > know all the areas you're talking about. Sorry about being not clear. I am saying filemap_fault -> do_async_mmap_readahead Let's assume the page is hit in page cache and vmf->flags is !FAULT_FLAG TRIED so it calls do_async_mmap_readahead. Since the page has PG_reclaim and PG_writeback by shrink_page_list, it goes to do_async_mmap_readahead if (PageReadahead(page)) fpin = maybe_unlock_mmap_for_io(); page_cache_async_readahead if (PageWriteback(page)) return; ClearPageReadahead(page); <- doesn't reach here until the writeback is clear So, mm_populate will repeat the loop until the writeback is done. It's my just theory but didn't comfirm it by the testing. If I miss something clear, let me know it. Thanks! > > > > > > > /* > > > * Same bit is used for PG_readahead and PG_reclaim. > > > */ > > > if (PageWriteback(page)) > > > return; > > > > > > ClearPageReadahead(page);