Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:00:28 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?B?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        "open list:SCHEDULER" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] why can't dynamic isolation just like the static way
Message-ID: <20200211090028.4e12d02e@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20200211114350.GJ14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <fed10a26-7423-23b5-316c-c74d354870dd@linux.alibaba.com>
        <20200211114350.GJ14914@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:43:50 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:17:34PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> > Hi, folks
> > 
> > We are dealing with isolcpus these days and try to do the isolation
> > dynamically.
> > 
> > The kernel doc lead us into the cpuset.sched_load_balance, it's fine
> > to achieve the dynamic isolation with it, however we got problem with
> > the systemd stuff.  
> 
> Then don't use systemd :-) Also, if systemd is the problem, why are you
> bugging us?

[ Background. Peter is someone that doesn't even use systemd. ;-) ]

-- Steve