Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964992AbWBGLB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:01:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965015AbWBGLB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:01:59 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([134.68.220.30]:4288 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964992AbWBGLB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:01:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:01:49 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Lee Revell , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060207110149.GB8046@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> Mail-Followup-To: Nigel Cunningham , Lee Revell , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060207030129.GA23860@mail> <1139282224.2041.48.camel@mindpipe> <200602071332.51676.nigel@suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602071332.51676.nigel@suspend2.net> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1687 Lines: 52 --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 01:32:46PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Now to #2.I haven't seen download statistics for Suspend2 since last May.= =20 > At that time, we had a release that was current for about 3 months. Durin= g=20 > that time, there were 12,000 downloads of the version (2.1.8 IIRC). Let's= =20 > say that half of them actually applied the software and used it. Does 600= 0=20 > people make it worth it? Of course, having said that, I don't know how=20 > many people would be more likely to use it if it was in mainline and they= =20 > didn't have to patch their kernels, but I'd suspect it would be at least= =20 > that number again. And those downloads doesn't include the users of distributions, where suspend2 is already well integrated. In Gentoo, for instance, we mirror the suspend2 patches on our own mirror system (We didn't do this last May, though). Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFD6H4dv+Q4flTiePgRAlclAKCViE6uZLrCtZ+o8EHhKWbu3Nq0gACfU7IN 9MtSc+FUemOyytZs4n7J1dc= =1TLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/