Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5391781ybv; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:59:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxc4A2V8NZmBvOftWv3HytcbT20XOY5lJ+1Evgp/8zqCxdi8g9lbylEYlus2UdANyed6+3t X-Received: by 2002:a54:4182:: with SMTP id 2mr4225303oiy.14.1581461967676; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:59:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581461967; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lLMiobZb01mk+LrEhGw+/ugyORF3bkB0Bn0Jkp+kKjPXwBpf6RVuWUp2IHJpHz3fl8 M1icTBZxZS4VGfEMKjTMeHWVGvmVfbXGfw0MTuQl35xJ9GW9fm8zysK7bLqJqOgO0qE2 7TQQ7XVURzCGKqm0INYVmGLyXKOwr6+RGZ8p0WZ7GQjc80M9TVkoBq4S0TVfLsI5nErs cNKnHYxlvRS9rhXdMtIoThUWZvXnjN7OKlnfn8wRTkWcIIkb+lrsE13bNmyjTx7uhBFp 40xVRd3LmpBqgsjQm9UW5zMx7aoVLOYcURK42A4OcfjUU6wEbbM7HumPLP0XZu65UiR8 XFsQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=tHccCOTOym6C8xOpWPI+tFdd+JZELndt45SaxASUypg=; b=xhWitACpecqOR92tfS6LRmRf3Li/0TzbSOCLEW8c9z/LQ9v5FZxw01TLK2dCumTc6J 2N8VmkKcIhc3MGx2W+DOYF2TJAC9fF061mDlwfPamaGWv1bThtuIAdfdq0qX37CT1NcQ rqUcIKitkAGWU5pg3246TWYd+CEH7GjuePkrryOoHT0DnA5z8wJjUV+TP2R5bqKKy4J0 n7qH8Zovg5P5IWElYwvOL9zdwAPu2rcsUlubGEmCIvSQuSYhzDc4fEU30M+bOB7QCgMZ yd/03XdimH1Xm/rWoBSakycUG8hq1zUxTo2OkgTp7lXAhxbB/2Z9jgXI9U8gQrDrWbu7 x8mQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s22si2823848otq.100.2020.02.11.14.59.15; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:59:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727740AbgBKW5x (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:57:53 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:7940 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727199AbgBKW5w (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:57:52 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2020 14:57:47 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,428,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="251710669" Received: from ahduyck-desk1.jf.intel.com ([10.7.198.76]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2020 14:57:47 -0800 Message-ID: <17f2a84522bbbf920b0a34344829df10b89b249e.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: Should I repost? (was: Re: [PATCH v16.1 0/9] mm / virtio: Provide support for free page reporting) From: Alexander Duyck To: Mel Gorman Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, nitesh@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, pagupta@redhat.com, riel@surriel.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, osalvador@suse.de, vbabka@suse.cz, AlexanderDuyck , kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:57:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20200211104041.GK3466@techsingularity.net> References: <20200122173040.6142.39116.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <6758b1e3373fc06b37af1c87901237974d52322f.camel@linux.intel.com> <20200211104041.GK3466@techsingularity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.5 (3.32.5-1.fc30) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 10:40 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:18:59AM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > So I thought I would put out a gentle nudge since it has been about 4 > > > weeks since v16 was submitted, a little over a week and a half for v16.1, > > > and I have yet to get any feedback on the code contained in the patchset. > > > Codewise nothing has changed from the v16 patchset other than rebasing it > > > off of the linux-next tree to resolve some merge conflicts that I saw > > > recently, and discussion around v16.1 was mostly about next steps and how > > > to deal with the page cache instead of discussing the code itself. > > > > > > The full patchset can be found at: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200122173040.6142.39116.stgit@localhost.localdomain/ > > > > > > I believe I still need review feedback for patches 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > - Alex > > > > So I had posted this patch set a few days before Linus's merge window > > opened. When I posted it the discussion was about what the follow-up on > > this patch set will be in terms of putting pressure on the page cache to > > force it to shrink. However I didn't get any review comments on the code > > itself. > > > > My last understanding on this patch set is that I am waiting on patch > > feedback from Mel Gorman as he had the remaining requests that led to most > > of the changes in v15 and v16. I believe I have addressed them, but I > > don't believe he has had a chance to review them. > > > > I am wondering now if it is still possible to either get it reviewed > > and/or applied without reposting, or do I need to repost it since it has > > been several weeks since I submitted it? The patch set still applies to > > the linux-next tree without any issues. > > > > Please repost to take into account that this is confirmed to be working > as expected after the merge window and has not conflicted with anything > else that got merged in the meantime. This fell off my radar because of the > timing when it was posted and the volume of mail I was receiving. I simply > noted a large amount of traffic in response to the series and assumed > others had issues that would get resolved without looking closely. Now > I see that it was all comments on future work instead of the series itself. > > Sorry. > No problem. I have reposted as v17. I made a slight tweak to the cover page, rebased on today's linux-next and QEMU, rebuilt and reran some of the tests to verify the functionality and performance are still running about the same. The full patch set with QEMU patches can be found here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200211224416.29318.44077.stgit@localhost.localdomain/ Thanks. - Alex