Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5489478ybv; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwfZKQZ06ZuF2DssmbLita8yDQViRAlPRHAG76WNSctqxt4axcdUC7rr2eFNvuS570+Eh2o X-Received: by 2002:a9d:664a:: with SMTP id q10mr6973245otm.298.1581469431066; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581469431; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xV+TBiRLeAvIryoadKFg0vBNygfEdo+9RFkZ7UMNche7XW5H7pHTAJcRZxdbe/TiIX mibSag+oNkMFnkDu4BBDhEtIllJkBVqLYJYjzUOc9NuWPK7CTdDnYnM0R0PbpEgFAnH8 s1WLsITpxgcT0Ry0GZznnS0wR8w3JXJ6OXjkXEUGal58ewFlKt8s1MfP2WIOQhsiOHRY 4A7zKYTbcHwpAT4J0r3mi0F1MnYIxY6d308Vpt56Z8D8GpprcR40HKyjCiIL+ZT4+NYf CgzkRI884/uLGfWyvverOc1i1EKr/oe8iS+wqqZxwqsPENpSXE76kDnGXEfPnZncXUfd fK0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zy6kGEEkqAsEiZzWHqRtvxnsI6DtM6n9AdiuD2GudTU=; b=j6Ct7WA6KOHyZiwQMPbcvUVgZR0Mn2Czeobco5ZI+lR5c/WdDBq6L8vrc7yb1ax+7g TOGZYXwzzvUVaoQl7sVsr+d9s6hn6AJ9JRUIkpAx5eCSghfbwRWAnESjmQAHVBZnmdA4 XIgW9x4ODIy07CgUO1EulU6Niy9xFgLrFFwjAoD38G1aVgSzpsh1FNC/2PS0gpxObbhf X8j1Wd+bSk0gGg4/vEfNapatahPVjvg1gyt+ckyO7mRGwCX+THCYZf3Y5lVh/af5r7dW 72kZnBVe6PzNEpghm07fdXZXCwa1AwpIUwWGVk/eSJmRb1lHwTG8FFoI6kgWkpOwRmNi RTAg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=fBxG1Hcr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l9si2778876oti.229.2020.02.11.17.03.38; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.s=google header.b=fBxG1Hcr; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728186AbgBLBDX (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:03:23 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:43618 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728120AbgBLBDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:03:23 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 9so287476lfq.10 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zy6kGEEkqAsEiZzWHqRtvxnsI6DtM6n9AdiuD2GudTU=; b=fBxG1HcrByKfPtNty2DhtyD54YlVBt8nIN51NK2VPpgZ7L26CoMAQYrrNez+Edd1Gn KLAHlVWkm3Q8uZOGQqKfncW351w+GkpekQ1AxurxF26lO2WmqXR1y7xwYNvUiRUf7dX7 p/ZI6Bsp5G+eMc0JFhnEsMBjvUERkEUAYwFn4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zy6kGEEkqAsEiZzWHqRtvxnsI6DtM6n9AdiuD2GudTU=; b=ZKWadedcZD7fAVq3sV07DzLHxvvzXPviicDhNaQvTuRPHnVnAeGAYX7InJrEVHJw15 gA1oVUAKnm98uAluu8hBMCO6Z8N70YH5KJ8+WSDNGbGVFp5nKj2fG6b0MznAMh63RJUl d4NId4yrDVFVG13OvMe9bS4ZipQ0AuC9vTnxdT7tjcGu4mChlogbyVOUJpqfc80tEucY RWfy00N68xmoRId77nNkg4oqVoeVn1SV06bjhlcNkdhUb3Ry0PfCC3t4dWg4GA8SdXZ+ nnhiBJ+ij6AEZQG26j8EzMqczw0TtAFuGYkpMoBY0IIWedh2rLyLQM8tC8cte/wXeDM/ G4dA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfE0olNAaZr/IWuevBWVhOEhTFbCT3RyTOKFXzIyIimAZ9Qbwj 0c/+v+qIywgahyuJ6kNqBS8y27fPfuE= X-Received: by 2002:a19:48c5:: with SMTP id v188mr5257655lfa.100.1581469400021; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lj1-f181.google.com (mail-lj1-f181.google.com. [209.85.208.181]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y29sm2944267ljd.88.2020.02.11.17.03.18 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-f181.google.com with SMTP id y6so334724lji.0 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a2e:580c:: with SMTP id m12mr6104508ljb.150.1581469398565; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200211175507.178100-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> <29b6e848ff4ad69b55201751c9880921266ec7f4.camel@surriel.com> <20200211193101.GA178975@cmpxchg.org> <20200211154438.14ef129db412574c5576facf@linux-foundation.org> <20200211164701.4ac88d9222e23d1e8cc57c51@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200211164701.4ac88d9222e23d1e8cc57c51@linux-foundation.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:03:02 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: keep inodes with page cache off the inode shrinker LRU To: Andrew Morton , Russell King , Linux ARM , Catalin Marinas Cc: Johannes Weiner , Rik van Riel , linux-fsdevel , Linux-MM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dave Chinner , Yafang Shao , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Al Viro , kernel-team@fb.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 4:47 PM Andrew Morton wrote: > > What's the situation with highmem on ARM? Afaik it's exactly the same as highmem on x86 - only 32-bit ARM ever needed it, and I was ranting at some people for repeating all the mistakes Intel did. But arm64 doesn't need it, and while 32-bit arm is obviosuly still selling, I think that in many ways the switch-over to 64-bit has been quicker on ARM than it was on x86. Partly because it happened later (so all the 64-bit teething pains were dealt with), but largely because everybody ended up actively discouraging 32-bit on the Android side. There were a couple of unfortunate early 32-bit arm server attempts, but they were - predictably - complete garbage and nobody bought them. They don't exist any more. So at least my gut feel is that the arm people don't have any big reason to push for maintaining HIGHMEM support either. But I'm adding a couple of arm people and the arm list just in case they have some input. [ Obvious background for newly added people: we're talking about making CONFIG_HIGHMEM a deprecated feature and saying that if you want to run with lots of memory on a 32-bit kernel, you're doing legacy stuff and can use a legacy kernel ] Linus