Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1654227.8mz0SueHsU@kreacher> <197693303.hiACyxC3Vm@kreacher> <20200212100810.GA4028@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20200212100810.GA4028@sirena.org.uk>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:16:27 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i8DsjQkf_4ezOYMrvB47ZuxsgNmTbHQB-JEK8bMHUpPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/28] sound: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of pm_qos_*()
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:34:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Call cpu_latency_qos_add/update/remove_request() and
> > cpu_latency_qos_request_active() instead of
> > pm_qos_add/update/remove_request() and pm_qos_request_active(),
> > respectively, because the latter are going to be dropped.
>
> What's the story with dependencies here, I only have this patch and not
> the cover letter?

The cover letter is here:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0h1z2p66J5KB3P0RjPkLE-DfDbcfhG_OrnDG_weir7HMA@mail.gmail.com/T/#m92ce7ffd743083e89e45c0a98da8c0140e44c70b

Generally speaking, this patch depends on the previous patches in the series.