Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5929639ybv; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:58:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy4+0YmesUNvK0/hcDgMLS/SqB5y7JddqhTi3mk+mH5E9ygFnAMu5wuQ25XlG7goTPnDf6u X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4b05:: with SMTP id q5mr8417691otf.57.1581505112420; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:58:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581505112; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FgxOyHzNOWkMdvCOBC++joxG79yXe++UHlNq1y+YqyWvXTAvfL1J2afoqPpy7CFeVq cfIHwj0BaOhGeTJ0s2mFMzmvQHybT66OcMCpOxeT+SoUQ0jVHXqdV22qGtLitwrq+7k4 OABhmFnXCiDDHz6+fgL5o70ZDrFxCt4//HrAIBR0LSkyqoBBR7DSa5Idl5cEL6KTf9su MiHGKs+Hw2QCaF0t9RFEptd4OgRaR/p86M+3Bqw2uSNIMwRcqelyq0ZvIiKgSmcRdAW3 2GHITpw2ercRWZkXv/puKyPCfrrHTsg09kDClORBxNr1EBD9UxOBqycglCPBmOe8o3Dy SQhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=+n4erFid6klYCL9dOobC/BSS5sq0U9B56DmBwWDTjWI=; b=VgXybDFD2yThzhoVtuhsDa0KGdOAy8/Bi6uWJwAo7V78Rmf0n8y8n7bUMtDrGsOjog dCUEWJUNhKShP+1OQjiWp/TF/rQwY5ooXayWqNJyZlZWOx01v+q8WLW81aN9XP0yQKn/ djgx8J+yJGOBaUoa1DIuWNdyjfszw8Eiy5zh5DNuKTHX2eFz+l9HTPzAgAQrtR2ewdri GGaN6bl5xsix7mChYJ3NEGtb8ISwUeunUDYSEkIrDnUcmTjXytWtSfPi68j3GpDFJX7T tuoWsl4EpUwTgZ6yS4ENRRZmodqN19smOXKDbzf7JOCkcvdlq1SQ4579mzhtIn4LYkGL yLBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o15si28018otp.314.2020.02.12.02.58.19; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 02:58:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727652AbgBLK44 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:56:56 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:6261 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727594AbgBLK4y (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 05:56:54 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Feb 2020 02:56:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,428,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="432283931" Received: from rongch2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.193.108]) ([10.249.193.108]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Feb 2020 02:56:51 -0800 Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [perf x86] b77491648e: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -2.1% regression To: Andi Kleen Cc: Roman Sudarikov , 0day robot , Kan Liang , Alexander Antonov , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org References: <20200205123110.GN12867@shao2-debian> <87tv44danp.fsf@linux.intel.com> From: "Chen, Rong A" Message-ID: <782f409a-ff90-831c-56a0-abb3c31ab8d8@intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:56:50 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tv44danp.fsf@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/6/2020 4:47 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > kernel test robot writes: > >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -2.1% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit: >> >> >> commit: b77491648e6eb2f26b6edf5eaea859adc17f4dcc ("perf x86: Infrastructure for exposing an Uncore unit to PMON mapping") >> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roman-sudarikov-linux-intel-com/perf-x86-Exposing-IO-stack-to-IO-PMON-mapping-through-sysfs/20200118-075508 > Seems to be spurious bisect. I don't think that commit could change > anything performance related. Hi Andi, I commented out some lines in arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c and will-it-scale.per_process_ops increased. commit: v5.4 b77491648e ("perf x86: Infrastructure for exposing an Uncore unit to PMON mapping") f33fe1b258 ("test")             v5.4  b77491648e6eb2f26b6edf5eae f33fe1b258b2a4b2fc97600b2b  testcase/testparams/testbox ----------------  -------------------------- --------------------------  ---------------------------          %stddev      change         %stddev      change %stddev              \          |                \          | \      47983                       47004 47647 will-it-scale/performance-process-100%-signal1-ucode=0xb000038/lkp-bdw-ep6      47983                       47004 47647        GEO-MEAN will-it-scale.per_process_ops diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c index 55201bfde2c84c..0dc9c455423d99 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int uncore_pmu_register(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu)                 pmu->pmu.attr_groups = pmu->type->attr_groups;         } -       pmu->pmu.attr_update = attr_update; +       // pmu->pmu.attr_update = attr_update;         if (pmu->type->num_boxes == 1) {                 if (strlen(pmu->type->name) > 0) @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ static int uncore_pmu_register(struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu)          * Exposing mapping of Uncore units to corresponding Uncore PMUs          * through /sys/devices/uncore__/mapping          */ -       uncore_platform_mapping(pmu->type); +       // uncore_platform_mapping(pmu->type);         ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, pmu->name, -1);         if (!ret) Best Regards, Rong Chen > > -Andi > _______________________________________________ > LKP mailing list -- lkp@lists.01.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@lists.01.org