Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6100474ybv; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:05:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQiq7ABdUQi+RKzeEFD868TYwH3fiBiSrSaoJ03gf5JDoBzVhRDBfPl/EIw+rmjN5ZpuAV X-Received: by 2002:aca:c1c2:: with SMTP id r185mr6472036oif.19.1581516328001; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:05:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581516327; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kB8cGjrEk2uJkPGwCOBXrDbcrC0/3AAP06CeOHgAJjes67gvb5h7aiLo70Ak0DldEG vbKMW3IG49/p+qDYMg/ppreKyiR3bQKvkQyWTSy+wIIwS2pBE7pGm938lWF44hFwkGHz INfNzmP+plYxiMd2lkm8AHXxFijxyorH6vtaTWTC9Nx3m+sXm2E8+SOJ00IxbIjkhAEK WCjU4Y7hPJc5CYB10Grw+kAwLis80fTxkx2yshso9v4F4dLbOiiHuPT3REclIFf3H8Md nyu6/Ss9AmE+7qkZ18R31+edRGvQ4pM5NZwVlYvbBeDiO+jotxexcPkxZ/4taJa8P665 Z7/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=3TUbnbkJZHP0DWJYA2Aax63ReJpP70LP0sGoIe1ZfXA=; b=fUzsnO26jwSX0v4MnmtlQAd0W4jnM0dEzJRh3CrDhbHgZdr7jsSz10RdDswAgApYxR jT11e2zYnzqTaxyRHfol5VnvoN6Uz0l7EMhzRSSUF+jImphXpnfI4wTXTW3WiAFV680q YBSVmNT8tIi6iIULtnlBltErV9sRcAq700RS5QdvWycptRg3i4HzvcG4g1/odLaix/Xv eC9qRPFXzA5Ok415BqQmNzDmTD+VqoqnKl+b1ZT0jUExog2IxDDrNhcfaMngc4BbT5Ae XYgsbTDtbLcOnYZZeOoXNaTNSTb3qgUT59eu/K6P83c82zZPeAXi7YQDMEEjtoF+lsqq lr6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 5si302208otm.88.2020.02.12.06.05.14; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728252AbgBLOEg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:04:36 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33286 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725887AbgBLOEg (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:04:36 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B43328; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.196.37] (e121345-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241AA3F6CF; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 06:04:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: dma_mask limited to 32-bits with OF platform device To: Roger Quadros , Christoph Hellwig , =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a9ter_Ujfalusi?= , Murali Karicheri , "Nori, Sekhar" , "Anna, Suman" Cc: stefan.wahren@i2se.com, afaerber@suse.de, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, Rob Herring , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nishanth Menon , "hdegoede@redhat.com" References: <3a91f306-f544-a63c-dfe2-7eae7b32bcca@arm.com> <56314192-f3c6-70c5-6b9a-3d580311c326@ti.com> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <9bd83815-6f54-2efb-9398-42064f73ab1c@arm.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:04:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56314192-f3c6-70c5-6b9a-3d580311c326@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/02/2020 12:33 pm, Roger Quadros wrote: [...] > For now, let's say that we limit dma-ranges to 4GB size. with > "dma-ranges = <0x00000000 0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;" > Then, dma_bus_limit is set correctly to 0xffffffff, SATA driver sets > masks to 64-bit as IP supports that. > > [   13.306847] ahci 4a140000.sata: dma_mask 0xffffffffffffffff, > coherent_mask 0xffffffffffffffff, dma_bus_limit 0xffffffff > > However, the SATA controller still tries to do DMA above 32-bits. > dma_alloc() doesn't seem to be taking dma_bus_limit into account? Yay ARM LPAE... Peter and Christoph have already been playing whack-a-mole with other bugs under that config - is this with or without SWIOTLB? (and whichever way, does the other work any better?) Robin.