Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:44:24 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To:     Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@es.iitr.ac.in>
Cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Springer <rspringer@google.com>,
        Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging:gasket:gasket_core.c:unified quoted string
 split across lines in one line
Message-ID: <20200212144424.GI1778@kadam>
References: <20200211200456.GA10351@kaaira-HP-Pavilion-Notebook>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002112139550.3266@hadrien>
 <20200212115035.GB21751@kaaira-HP-Pavilion-Notebook>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200212115035.GB21751@kaaira-HP-Pavilion-Notebook>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 05:20:35PM +0530, Kaaira Gupta wrote:
> When the driver tries to map a region, but the region has certain
> permissions, or when it attempts to open gasket with tgid, or when it
> realeases device node;

We don't care about any of this information...

> the logs are displayed in one line only while the
> code has the strings split in two lines which makes it difficult for
> developers to search for code based on the log messages. So, this patch
> fixes three warnings of 'quoted string split across lines' in
> gasket_core.c by merging the strings in one line.
> 
> Also, I wasn't sure if I were to send a separate batch or reply with a
> v2 for this one. If former was the case than please let me know.
> Thanks for your time!

I would say:

"Kernel style says not to split string literals across mutliple lines
because it makes it difficult to grep the source for the printk.  I have
changed the code accordingly.  It will not affect runtime."

That's not imperative and some subsystems are more strict about "you're
not allowed to use the words 'I', 'we' or 'this patch'" in a commit
description.  But in staging we are pragmatists.  So long as it's clear
why you're writing the patch that's the main thing.

The other problem with this code is that some of these messages are over
80 characters long themselves which is very long for one line.

It doesn't matter if you send the v2 as a reply or not.

regards,
dan carpenter