Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200115182816.33892-1-trishalfonso@google.com>
 <CACT4Y+b4+5PQvUeeHi=3g0my0WbaRaNEWY3P-MOVJXYSO7U5aA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKFsvU+zaY6B_+g=UTpOddKXXgVaKWxH3c8nw6GSLceb1Mg2qA@mail.gmail.com> <CACT4Y+aHRiR_7hiRE0DmaCQV2NzaqL0-kbMoVPJU=5-pcOBxJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+aHRiR_7hiRE0DmaCQV2NzaqL0-kbMoVPJU=5-pcOBxJA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:25:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKFsvUJ2w=re_-q5PTV8c30aVwot8zMOipRvhD9cCx-9cc-Ksw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UML: add support for KASAN under x86_64
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc:     Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
        David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 10:24 PM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:19 AM Patricia Alfonso
> <trishalfonso@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:53 AM Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +void kasan_init(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       kasan_map_memory((void *)KASAN_SHADOW_START, KASAN_SHADOW_SIZE);
> > > > +
> > > > +       // unpoison the kernel text which is form uml_physmem -> uml_reserved
> > > > +       kasan_unpoison_shadow((void *)uml_physmem, physmem_size);
> > > > +
> > > > +       // unpoison the vmalloc region, which is start_vm -> end_vm
> > > > +       kasan_unpoison_shadow((void *)start_vm, (end_vm - start_vm + 1));
> > > > +
> > > > +       init_task.kasan_depth = 0;
> > > > +       pr_info("KernelAddressSanitizer initialized\n");
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Was this tested with stack instrumentation? Stack instrumentation
> > > changes what shadow is being read/written and when. We don't need to
> > > get it working right now, but if it does not work it would be nice to
> > > restrict the setting and leave some comment traces for future
> > > generations.
> > If you are referring to KASAN_STACK_ENABLE, I just tested it and it
> > seems to work fine.
>
>
> I mean stack instrumentation which is enabled with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK.

I believe I was testing with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK set to 1 since that is
the default value when compiling with GCC.The syscall_stub_data error
disappears when the value of CONFIG_KASAN_STACK is 0, though.


-- 
Patricia Alfonso