Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp6583564ybv; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRz8k7NSyxPqqnoCUChY0JDDrbrC7cI3ISooRqeGD0Wkd1EN/KmJbw+F/7cMbcWN5wZJw8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18f5:: with SMTP id d21mr11111030otf.225.1581549831454; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581549831; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=W7mWi/sVw4DH8dBXHFMoGvxBoje5x/TNrQa3xXZVggYElI1LOB/8Yy3r02Ij4MoHT+ nYP+tj3sOgwP9JWr5+cDDr5LAnXmKWulC2e96vShi2gEao8e9H3OMSynpOmEoQS8YnXX J+IxEQe8Rf2diRwp1XwGQeQ9jfvdkFlhjxPhyBBbNhZ/iR7Pth8MHJxNzgNrcDf/fshZ EVjo7F1Jbus8x3ryokzghdH/UXUnOT1+IqRo0yB5PVWHEApv+Q4J/+mOeJx+YiL9AK+O XLOwBDzFJYk6rXPEKmYTPqPoqL+fzt3dSoSKz+pgRvYhcIuNG0fFVl3hMc9xvN2+HSL1 +N+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:message-id:date:to:cc:from :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=6coE+x/d+J7NgTInF9UFUTDZLoIhdOWBhONIprZ73xI=; b=WmHbNDZ4sPkW/FjLLKp1+Uvu+QvaM3MZ83OgaiYRhIEHU/MO8+4i4sKzkTEoyksyTt FjEARBq2Tol/pbJePe5VB+vhp5/PiHYLTwhNVXZGsY4Yo6LbfMS4fwFC1VmY41RwcZMS PkJvGcG9Lu3GELOm5ptR32np9AEG91VT4Vsdkose6lOziJxERUoUXtsJ/7fqVQ9tf4rY yaYmXglr8RD1JO+4nEAJkqJwOyAEQ0iujks+CflXrC33Izf4WAFzHELUV+/GLrohcSmH gsoz21o79ZjxS4XNvqNmhUx57WMc3w6c2+lDlfQRAu4vVG2IxdDaCkrg2gnVwF8F2fJe 0r4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=1gdDaDj4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p186si300757oih.172.2020.02.12.15.23.38; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=1gdDaDj4; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729244AbgBLXXK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:23:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33280 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727117AbgBLXXK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 18:23:10 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FB3020848; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:23:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581549789; bh=TvICLvO9Snk4i7FuNgUQI0ItU+qw1IAxuj3QcAxRPM0=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=1gdDaDj409R0nHzjEurNMPfxA0HIjFQdV+yJnpk9xhebX21Rx1UiXKxEDc0lZqi4R 7+1eZWfMS8M9vBOcMx4DAEKhSVkx1q5kdu0u9N22Exka94D4KVIaHMfuCFLsmmNB64 Xfm3fIbHaB3L3ljZcdTMkLViqSHmkjXd9GLNaAhE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <0101016eee224b83-b0577d24-8f51-4e1a-9afb-b3f518e5ba77-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <20191205002503.13088-1-masneyb@onstation.org> <20191205002503.13088-2-masneyb@onstation.org> <0101016eee224b83-b0577d24-8f51-4e1a-9afb-b3f518e5ba77-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: qcom: add support for setting the duty cycle From: Stephen Boyd Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, agross@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Masney , Taniya Das , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:23:08 -0800 Message-ID: <158154978850.184098.12366153456613977692@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Taniya Das (2019-12-09 20:47:35) > Hi Brian, >=20 > On 12/5/2019 5:54 AM, Brian Masney wrote: > > + d_reg_val =3D mask - (((mask - 17) * duty->num) / duty->den); > > + ret =3D __clk_rcg2_configure_with_duty_cycle(rcg, rcg->freq_tbl, > > + d_reg_val, duty->num, > > + duty->den); >=20 > The duty-cycle calculation is not accurate. > There is already a plan to submit the duty-cycle changes from my side. What are the plans to submit this? Should we expect to see this support in the next week? Month?