Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200212075529.156756-1-drinkcat@chromium.org>
 <20200212081340.vcfd3t5w5pgxfuha@vireshk-i7> <CANMq1KA1=LTtCD2ic7GcskX7izuEkAqUo1xxwwCXBeTLi0r5vg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200212090356.x6aieuddym5zea5d@vireshk-i7>
In-Reply-To: <20200212090356.x6aieuddym5zea5d@vireshk-i7>
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:06:39 +0800
Message-ID: <CANMq1KCut88owb2r5_uHi-k57io0T_D9ag0rf==UAEsqoH07eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add support for multiple regulators
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:04 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 12-02-20, 16:57, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > I see... And you're right that it's probably best to change the
> > voltages in a specific order (I just ignored that problem ,-P). I do
> > wonder if there's something we could do in the core/DT to specify that
> > order (if it's a simple order?), it's not really ideal to have to copy
> > paste code around...
>
> I will suggest adding your own version (like TI) for now, if we later
> feel that there is too much duplicate code, we can look for an
> alternative. But as of now, there aren't a lot of platforms using
> multiple regulators anyway.

Will do. Thanks!

> --
> viresh