Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp52352ybv; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:01:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwKwPLA7gTsdzql3FRwhmDfcfYWOe87+sHcHuyyGkCeH6DC82nmSA6p5XBTLjnNG6DpS6w7 X-Received: by 2002:aca:6542:: with SMTP id j2mr1545320oiw.69.1581562877430; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:01:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581562877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=1BBP5oHzLgVh9rLtMWOU0b+iudbIk6GbFQpvSGwzolSpRn4lYDljPLV5Q5o5YEeUZG K6lihWnWdJhHwDWFanocRUSA7lzaN3wFqwH5NNSCZkTJt12cPWs5W82LvRq00j7o43ch xubRlHQvrf6o/olvVLrNXNMcltGuw4dlxk4UBPl6tmZkGJMi/iQY+Tia/1shmxYyvjVo RKnkK5kZjLFVZwH2RzVghOMny5FsMkgEjCoZP4WuXJBStTrM0JsKH/kfIOrbOGW+g+dU 3dmrphnMa56/geA+8VAhgK/r1tiFDtWgYRxrYTrwT/MmAfhhhBjozwcigscl6jQ3L7zB +MjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=vZnUqcdXaoIFUgRwgcTUHEfFmUCUNV+itM1StfvEwy4=; b=wTrF4AFT8inQpd4YhPqOnMS03EARb/AvQlPZb0SGHc5OTlIYaqbCLFFskBvg/DcWZx I+Z1esRnZjh57Fe5r5OUoog9j7VhCan2EGKFNPLKDHK/9Ac+QQradtZQhkLGQwAEVPCv mE3/5dGjD0rqsi19BOQySMfSP/DmdMimhiX1tC5ZIAYpgtwm8ZIOQOYaTKcmr21DyFME wpR2Dooie+z7+lpjFJkDDrJ6ELd0rTuMO/x2NLfr7+17PUbzN/Dc63I2GeWxnq3ExxL0 3tLlEJKqEw8eZe589DB0W6Gozd7lMQDzye0FSkD6Duyvoi3unq6rA+iEqFr3241lwl/Z GL0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t7si392513otl.133.2020.02.12.19.00.40; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:01:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729570AbgBMDAY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:00:24 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:10615 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729546AbgBMDAY (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 22:00:24 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 794A93135E4076A8B01B; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:00:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.173.221.195) by DGGEMS406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:00:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/64 To: , , , , , , , , , CC: , References: <20200206025825.22934-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> From: Jason Yan Message-ID: <636f16fd-cc7b-ee2e-7496-c06bdc10c7af@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:00:13 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200206025825.22934-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.173.221.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi everyone, any comments or suggestions? Thanks, Jason on 2020/2/6 10:58, Jason Yan wrote: > This is a try to implement KASLR for Freescale BookE64 which is based on > my earlier implementation for Freescale BookE32: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=131718 > > The implementation for Freescale BookE64 is similar as BookE32. One > difference is that Freescale BookE64 set up a TLB mapping of 1G during > booting. Another difference is that ppc64 needs the kernel to be > 64K-aligned. So we can randomize the kernel in this 1G mapping and make > it 64K-aligned. This can save some code to creat another TLB map at > early boot. The disadvantage is that we only have about 1G/64K = 16384 > slots to put the kernel in. > > KERNELBASE > > 64K |--> kernel <--| > | | | > +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ > | | | |....| | | | | | | | | |....| | | > +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ > | | 1G > |-----> offset <-----| > > kernstart_virt_addr > > I'm not sure if the slot numbers is enough or the design has any > defects. If you have some better ideas, I would be happy to hear that. > > Thank you all. > > v2->v3: > Fix build error when KASLR is disabled. > v1->v2: > Add __kaslr_offset for the secondary cpu boot up. > > Jason Yan (6): > powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: refactor kaslr_legal_offset() and > kaslr_early_init() > powerpc/fsl_booke/64: introduce reloc_kernel_entry() helper > powerpc/fsl_booke/64: implement KASLR for fsl_booke64 > powerpc/fsl_booke/64: do not clear the BSS for the second pass > powerpc/fsl_booke/64: clear the original kernel if randomized > powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: rename kaslr-booke32.rst to kaslr-booke.rst > and add 64bit part > > .../{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} | 35 +++++++-- > arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S | 23 ++++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 14 ++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 4 +- > arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_decl.h | 19 ++--- > arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/kaslr_booke.c | 71 +++++++++++++------ > 7 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) > rename Documentation/powerpc/{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} (59%) >