Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp299589ybv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:29:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOWblI3nY0V0J0ywzpCoF7THcL9s2iOPalz+cSQAoM3XBdv2z+/jOI9574j7xuOTVD4E2H X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:154a:: with SMTP id l10mr12629977otp.44.1581582573303; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:29:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581582573; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H9lcHez3opurWNPjjzFbztL2f7gMuGaY+2Gr5TqCYowzSPfNeMKo4/qRdlSrb759cM aHjP48Yn0fkkhb8BhLIU2zK/WRwhRx6eHhsqLHimVDiBGWSeqUra39qrAKqbG2mo8T6n F+zquvhCwdBPuO8PVXCXepnMoHSpuuk2reR9/ZI/g5CQ9PkKbsaLIlUeIh1zJLwH/oC2 Ze4MjnXW6c7zerTwLy/ooi82MgJGUdlVT/yCqdJoHn7bRb+1U/lxZgq2W5l/FQRMWeBT FHlr1j77lBNNbYiE9+qeIGxsJcuGXujJU20SiK/Q6u5lva9gWT3EeowPBC3o1qW0ixEd FHHg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version; bh=g0QbAAEGIvbgeebeLJBQvp9Xo5d60HNrVU71fR2cokk=; b=jhESc3Aj1dzXdIDP7Nb2z7Ssx0aFf0F6VQushElIz9TF6cCzIlK++GMIUBdcmlSA4e okvcwc5nuH6aMg+ugLJYh1NCDNAj3Q+qbyuTuYajNwA2z1Mn56C2eVPu8K5u5lsW4toR woSyq9fGQflL8Vh+hJL0BCQrJXllqTYWyJ1xTLG7L87TAsAqkkhX3LNh/DazB/bMIDYv bzHhpTpdKTaHNZg9DNgY6+p9CoftWR+ek21QoDpygm/xaINsDOhJ9uJtBFGkwSDaGzqg DcW3oQ8MiHbFz9o7xCZCvBHUO5UdZvrkwl1mImkcITrEXq541HVjdieBsXTQHWHwQV6K g+bg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a17si817240otp.236.2020.02.13.00.29.20; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:29:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729618AbgBMI3I convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 03:29:08 -0500 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:48729 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729401AbgBMI3I (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 03:29:08 -0500 Received: from marcel-macbook.fritz.box (p4FEFC5A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.239.197.167]) by mail.holtmann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E1C4CECD2; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:38:29 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] Bluetooth: Update filters/whitelists for suspend From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:29:05 +0100 Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz , Alain Michaud , Bluez mailing list , ChromeOS Bluetooth Upstreaming , "David S. Miller" , Johan Hedberg , netdev , LKML , Jakub Kicinski Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <20200128015848.226966-1-abhishekpandit@chromium.org> <20200127175842.RFC.v2.3.Icc7c35e1cabf10f8a383a009694987520f1d1b35@changeid> To: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Abhishek, >>> When suspending, update the event filter for BR/EDR devices and the >>> whitelist for LE devices. BR/EDR devices are added to the event filter >>> and will auto-connect if found during suspend. For LE, we update the >>> filter to remove everything that is not wakeable during suspend. >>> Finally, we disconnect all connected devices and wait for that to >>> complete before returning in the suspend notifier. >>> >>> An example suspend flow with 1 BR/EDR HID device, 1 BR/EDR audio device, >>> 1 LE HID device, 1 LE non-HID (where HIDs are wakeable): >>> >>> PM_PREPARE_SUSPEND: >>> - Set event filter for BR/EDR HID device >>> - Clear anything from LE whitelist that is not wakeable >>> - Add (if not there) the LE HID device >>> - Disconnect all devices >> >> is this really the right order? Why not disconnect all devices first. We are suspending after all, so lets disconnect first and then create the appropriate accept filters. >> >> I have the feeling it would also make the overall logic a lot simpler since it fits more into the current model that is used internally for a lot of decision points (especially with LE). >> >>> PM_POST_SUSPEND: >>> - Clear event filter >>> - Restore LE whitelist (deleting anything not in le_pend_conn or >>> le_pend_report and then adding from those lists) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> * Refactored filters and whitelist settings to its own patch >>> * Refactored update_white_list to have clearer edge cases >>> * Add connected devices to whitelist (previously missing corner case) >>> >>> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h | 17 +- >>> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 5 + >>> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c | 28 ++- >>> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c | 8 + >>> 5 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h >>> index 6293bdd7d862..720d8e633f7e 100644 >>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h >>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h >>> @@ -932,10 +932,14 @@ struct hci_cp_sniff_subrate { >>> #define HCI_OP_RESET 0x0c03 >>> >>> #define HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT 0x0c05 >>> -struct hci_cp_set_event_flt { >>> - __u8 flt_type; >>> - __u8 cond_type; >>> - __u8 condition[0]; >>> +#define HCI_SET_EVENT_FLT_SIZE 9 >>> +struct hci_cp_set_event_filter { >>> + __u8 flt_type; >>> + __u8 cond_type; >>> + struct { >>> + bdaddr_t bdaddr; >>> + __u8 auto_accept; >>> + } __packed addr_conn_flt; >>> } __packed; >>> >>> /* Filter types */ >>> @@ -949,8 +953,9 @@ struct hci_cp_set_event_flt { >>> #define HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR 0x02 >>> >>> /* CONN_SETUP Conditions */ >>> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF 0x01 >>> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON 0x02 >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF 0x01 >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON 0x02 >>> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON_WITH_RS 0x03 >>> >>> #define HCI_OP_READ_STORED_LINK_KEY 0x0c0d >>> struct hci_cp_read_stored_link_key { >>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> index 74d703e46fb4..49eae4a802ac 100644 >>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h >>> @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ struct discovery_state { >>> #define SUSPEND_NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */ >>> >>> enum suspend_tasks { >>> + SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, >>> + SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, >>> + >>> SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER, >>> __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS >>> }; >>> @@ -406,6 +409,8 @@ struct hci_dev { >>> struct work_struct suspend_prepare; >>> enum suspended_state suspend_state_next; >>> enum suspended_state suspend_state; >>> + int disconnect_counter; >>> + bool freeze_filters; >>> >>> wait_queue_head_t suspend_wait_q; >>> DECLARE_BITMAP(suspend_tasks, __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS); >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c >>> index 6ddc4a74a5e4..76d25b3f4c73 100644 >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c >>> @@ -2474,6 +2474,7 @@ static void hci_inquiry_result_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) >>> static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) >>> { >>> struct hci_ev_conn_complete *ev = (void *) skb->data; >>> + struct inquiry_entry *ie; >>> struct hci_conn *conn; >>> >>> BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name); >>> @@ -2482,14 +2483,29 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb) >>> >>> conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr); >>> if (!conn) { >>> - if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK) >>> - goto unlock; >>> + /* Connection may not exist if auto-connected. Check the inquiry >>> + * cache to see if we've already discovered this bdaddr before. >>> + * Create a new connection if it was previously discovered. >>> + */ >>> + ie = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup(hdev, &ev->bdaddr); >>> + if (ie) { >>> + conn = hci_conn_add(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr, >>> + HCI_ROLE_SLAVE); >>> + if (!conn) { >>> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "no memory for new conn"); >>> + goto unlock; >>> + } >>> + } else { >>> + if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK) >>> + goto unlock; >> >> We are not going to get SCO_LINK auto-connected and thus we should really have it done just for ACL links. I don’t have good proposal to structure this handling at the moment, but we need to clean this up a bit. > > Ack, will look deeper into this. > >> >>> - conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK, &ev->bdaddr); >>> - if (!conn) >>> - goto unlock; >>> + conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK, >>> + &ev->bdaddr); >>> + if (!conn) >>> + goto unlock; >>> >>> - conn->type = SCO_LINK; >>> + conn->type = SCO_LINK; >>> + } >>> } >>> >>> if (!ev->status) { >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c >>> index 08908469c043..c930b9ff1cfd 100644 >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c >>> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ >>> #define HCI_REQ_PEND 1 >>> #define HCI_REQ_CANCELED 2 >>> >>> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND 0x1 >>> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA 0x2 >>> + >>> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW 0x0012 >>> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL 0x0060 >>> + >>> void hci_req_init(struct hci_request *req, struct hci_dev *hdev) >>> { >>> skb_queue_head_init(&req->cmd_q); >>> @@ -654,6 +660,12 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req) >>> { >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev; >>> >>> + /* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend*/ >> >> Please fix the coding style for comments. Extra space required between suspend and */ >> >> I also have the feeling that we should split BR/EDR from LE support. I think we can merge the BR/EDR support quicker since it is a lot simpler. Especially when it stands on its own. > > Ack. I kept them merged because I didn't want to change the request > completion function but I can separate them. > >> >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters) { >>> + BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend"); >>> + return; >>> + } >>> + >>> if (use_ext_scan(hdev)) { >>> struct hci_cp_le_set_ext_scan_enable cp; >>> >>> @@ -670,23 +682,67 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req) >>> } >>> } >>> >>> -static void add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req, >>> - struct hci_conn_params *params) >>> +static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr, >>> + u8 bdaddr_type) >>> +{ >>> + struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp; >>> + >>> + cp.bdaddr_type = bdaddr_type; >>> + bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, bdaddr); >>> + >>> + BT_DBG("Remove %pMR (0x%x) from whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type); >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp); >>> +} >>> + >>> +/* Adds connection to white list if needed. On error, returns -1 */ >>> +static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req, >>> + struct hci_conn_params *params, u8 *num_entries, >>> + u8 flags) >>> { >>> struct hci_cp_le_add_to_white_list cp; >>> + struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev; >>> + bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA); >>> + bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND); >>> >>> + /* Already in white list */ >>> + if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list, ¶ms->addr, >>> + params->addr_type)) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> + /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */ >>> + if (*num_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) >>> + return -1; >>> + >>> + /* White list can not be used with RPAs */ >>> + if (!allow_rpa && >>> + hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type)) { >>> + return -1; >>> + } >>> + >>> + /* During suspend, only wakeable devices can be in whitelist */ >>> + if (suspend && !hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, ¶ms->addr, >>> + params->addr_type)) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> + *num_entries += 1; >>> cp.bdaddr_type = params->addr_type; >>> bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, ¶ms->addr); >>> >>> + BT_DBG("Add %pMR (0x%x) to whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type); >>> hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> } >>> >>> -static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req) >>> +static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags) >>> { >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev; >>> struct hci_conn_params *params; >>> struct bdaddr_list *b; >>> - uint8_t white_list_entries = 0; >>> + u8 white_list_entries = 0; >>> + bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA); >>> + bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND); >>> + bool wakeable, pend_conn, pend_report; >>> >>> /* Go through the current white list programmed into the >>> * controller one by one and check if that address is still >>> @@ -695,26 +751,42 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req) >>> * command to remove it from the controller. >>> */ >>> list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->le_white_list, list) { >>> - /* If the device is neither in pend_le_conns nor >>> - * pend_le_reports then remove it from the whitelist. >>> + wakeable = !!hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type); >>> + pend_conn = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns, >>> + &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type); >>> + pend_report = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports, >>> + &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type); >>> + >>> + /* During suspend, we remove all non-wakeable devices >>> + * and leave all others alone. Connected devices will be >>> + * disconnected during suspend but may not be in the pending >>> + * list yet. >>> */ >>> - if (!hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns, >>> - &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type) && >>> - !hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports, >>> - &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) { >>> - struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp; >>> - >>> - cp.bdaddr_type = b->bdaddr_type; >>> - bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr); >>> - >>> - hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, >>> - sizeof(cp), &cp); >>> - continue; >>> - } >>> + if (suspend) { >>> + if (!wakeable) { >>> + del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type); >>> + continue; >>> + } >>> + } else { >>> + /* If the device is not likely to connect or report, >>> + * remove it from the whitelist. >>> + */ >>> + if (!pend_conn && !pend_report) { >>> + del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type); >>> + continue; >>> + } >>> >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) { >>> /* White list can not be used with RPAs */ >>> - return 0x00; >>> + if (!allow_rpa && >>> + hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, >>> + b->bdaddr_type)) { >>> + return 0x00; >>> + } >>> } >>> >>> white_list_entries++; >>> @@ -731,47 +803,30 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req) >>> * white list. >>> */ >>> list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_conns, action) { >>> - if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list, >>> - ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type)) >>> - continue; >>> - >>> - if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) { >>> - /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */ >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags)) >>> return 0x00; >>> - } >>> - >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr, >>> - params->addr_type)) { >>> - /* White list can not be used with RPAs */ >>> - return 0x00; >>> - } >>> - >>> - white_list_entries++; >>> - add_to_white_list(req, params); >>> } >>> >>> /* After adding all new pending connections, walk through >>> * the list of pending reports and also add these to the >>> - * white list if there is still space. >>> + * white list if there is still space. Abort if space runs out. >>> */ >>> list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_reports, action) { >>> - if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list, >>> - ¶ms->addr, params->addr_type)) >>> - continue; >>> - >>> - if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) { >>> - /* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */ >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags)) >>> return 0x00; >>> - } >>> + } >>> >>> - if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, ¶ms->addr, >>> - params->addr_type)) { >>> - /* White list can not be used with RPAs */ >>> - return 0x00; >>> + /* Currently connected devices will be missing from the white list and >>> + * we need to insert them into the whitelist if they are wakeable. We >>> + * can't insert later because we will have already returned from the >>> + * suspend notifier and would cause a spurious wakeup. >>> + */ >>> + if (suspend) { >>> + list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->le_conn_params, list) { >>> + if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, >>> + flags)) >>> + return 0x00; >>> } >>> - >>> - white_list_entries++; >>> - add_to_white_list(req, params); >>> } >> >> This goes to my point above. If we just disconnect everything, then the white list programming should be easily. Everything that is pending and have been elected for wakeup + incoming connection will be added. And then we are done. I don’t think much has to change except one extra check if wakeup is allowed or not. >> >>> >>> /* Select filter policy to use white list */ >>> @@ -861,11 +916,26 @@ static void hci_req_start_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 type, u16 interval, >>> } >>> } >>> >>> -void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req) >>> +void __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags) >>> { >>> struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev; >>> u8 own_addr_type; >>> u8 filter_policy; >>> + u8 window, interval; >>> + >>> + /* We allow whitelisting even with RPAs in suspend. In the worst case, >>> + * we won't be able to wake from devices that use the privacy1.2 >>> + * features. Additionally, once we support privacy1.2 and IRK >>> + * offloading, we can update this to also check for those conditions. >>> + */ >>> + if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND) >>> + flags |= LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA; >>> + >>> + /* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend */ >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters) { >>> + BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend"); >>> + return; >>> + } >>> >>> /* Set require_privacy to false since no SCAN_REQ are send >>> * during passive scanning. Not using an non-resolvable address >>> @@ -881,7 +951,8 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req) >>> * happen before enabling scanning. The controller does >>> * not allow white list modification while scanning. >>> */ >>> - filter_policy = update_white_list(req); >>> + BT_DBG("Updating white list with flags = %d", flags); >>> + filter_policy = update_white_list(req, flags); >>> >>> /* When the controller is using random resolvable addresses and >>> * with that having LE privacy enabled, then controllers with >>> @@ -896,8 +967,22 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req) >>> (hdev->le_features[0] & HCI_LE_EXT_SCAN_POLICY)) >>> filter_policy |= 0x02; >>> >>> - hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, hdev->le_scan_interval, >>> - hdev->le_scan_window, own_addr_type, filter_policy); >>> + if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND) { >>> + window = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW; >>> + interval = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL; >> >> I think we just want this done via some hdev->suspended variable or similar. > > In support of setting a separate flag, it is easier to grep for when a > specific flag is being used and passed to a function than it is to > check when a variable is being set in a global context variable. > >> >>> + } else { >>> + window = hdev->le_scan_window; >>> + interval = hdev->le_scan_interval; >>> + } >>> + >>> + BT_DBG("LE passive scan with whitelist = %d", filter_policy); >>> + hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, interval, window, >>> + own_addr_type, filter_policy); >>> +} >>> + >>> +void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req) >>> +{ >>> + __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, 0); >>> } >>> >>> static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance) >>> @@ -918,6 +1003,76 @@ static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance) >>> return adv_instance->scan_rsp_len; >>> } >>> >>> +static void hci_req_clear_event_filter(struct hci_request *req) >>> +{ >>> + struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f; >>> + >>> + memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f)); >>> + f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CLEAR_ALL; >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, 1, &f); >>> + >>> + /* Update page scan state (since we may have modified it when setting >>> + * the event filter). >>> + */ >>> + __hci_req_update_scan(req); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void hci_req_set_event_filter(struct hci_request *req) >>> +{ >>> + struct bdaddr_list *b; >>> + struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f; >>> + struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev; >>> + int filters_updated = 0; >>> + u8 scan; >>> + >>> + /* Always clear event filter when starting */ >>> + hci_req_clear_event_filter(req); >>> + >>> + list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->wakeable, list) { >>> + if (b->bdaddr_type != BDADDR_BREDR) >>> + continue; >>> + >>> + memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f)); >>> + bacpy(&f.addr_conn_flt.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr); >>> + f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CONN_SETUP; >>> + f.cond_type = HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR; >>> + f.addr_conn_flt.auto_accept = HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON; >>> + >>> + BT_DBG("Adding event filters for %pMR", &b->bdaddr); >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, sizeof(f), &f); >>> + >>> + filters_updated++; >>> + } >> >> If we would use the wakeable list just for BR/EDR then the filters_updated++ would become redundant and we could just check if the list is empty. >> >>> + >>> + scan = filters_updated ? SCAN_PAGE : SCAN_DISABLED; >>> + hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE, 1, &scan); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(struct hci_request *req, >>> + u8 flags) >>> +{ >>> + /* Can't change params without disabling first */ >>> + hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(req); >>> + >>> + /* Configure params and enable scanning */ >>> + __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, flags); >>> + >>> + /* Block suspend notifier on response */ >>> + set_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, req->hdev->suspend_tasks); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void le_suspend_req_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status, u16 opcode) >>> +{ >>> + BT_DBG("Request complete opcode=0x%x, status=0x%x", opcode, status); >>> + >>> + /* Expecting LE Set scan to return */ >>> + if (opcode == HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE && >>> + test_and_clear_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, >>> + hdev->suspend_tasks)) { >>> + wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q); >>> + } >>> +} >>> + >>> /* Call with hci_dev_lock */ >>> void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next) >>> { >>> @@ -932,6 +1087,44 @@ void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next) >>> >>> hdev->suspend_state = next; >>> >>> + hci_req_init(&req, hdev); >>> + if (next == BT_SUSPENDED) { >>> + /* Enable event filter for existing devices */ >>> + hci_req_set_event_filter(&req); >>> + >>> + /* Enable passive scan at lower duty cycle */ >>> + hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND); >>> + >>> + hdev->freeze_filters = true; >>> + >>> + /* Run commands before disconnecting */ >>> + hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete); >>> + >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter = 0; >>> + /* Soft disconnect everything (power off)*/ >>> + list_for_each_entry(conn, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) { >>> + hci_disconnect(conn, HCI_ERROR_REMOTE_POWER_OFF); >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter++; >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) { >>> + BT_DBG("Had %d disconnects. Will wait on them", >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter); >>> + set_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks); >>> + } >>> + } else { >>> + hdev->freeze_filters = false; >>> + >>> + hci_req_clear_event_filter(&req); >>> + >>> + /* Reset passive/background scanning to normal */ >>> + hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, 0); >>> + >>> + hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete); >>> + } >>> + >>> + hdev->suspend_state = next; >>> + >>> done: >>> clear_bit(SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER, hdev->suspend_tasks); >>> wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q); >>> @@ -2034,6 +2227,9 @@ void __hci_req_update_scan(struct hci_request *req) >>> if (mgmt_powering_down(hdev)) >>> return; >>> >>> + if (hdev->freeze_filters) >>> + return; >>> + >>> if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_CONNECTABLE) || >>> disconnected_whitelist_entries(hdev)) >>> scan = SCAN_PAGE; >>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c >>> index 58468dfa112f..269ce70e501c 100644 >>> --- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c >>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c >>> @@ -7451,6 +7451,14 @@ void mgmt_device_disconnected(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr, >>> >>> mgmt_event(MGMT_EV_DEVICE_DISCONNECTED, hdev, &ev, sizeof(ev), sk); >>> >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) { >>> + hdev->disconnect_counter--; >>> + if (hdev->disconnect_counter <= 0) { >>> + clear_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks); >>> + wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >> >> I think this disconnect_counter is a bit racy. I would rather check that our connection hash is empty. >> >> In addition, I have the feeling we better disable LE scanning BR/EDR page scan first. So that we clearly do not have any artifacts of accidental incoming connections. >> >> The first step when going to suspend should clean the house >> >> 1) Set a flag that all BR/EDR and LE connection attempts are rejected >> 2) Disable BR/EDR page scan >> 3) Disable LE advertising >> 2) Disable LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry >> 4) Disconnect all >> >> Now we have a clean house and we now prepare for wakeup triggers >> >> 1) Clear flag and allow incoming connection >> 2) Set BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed >> 3) Set LE whitelist and enable scanning if needed >> >> When we wake up, then we also just need to reset the filters >> >> 1) Clear BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed >> 2) Update LE white and enable scanning if needed >> 3) Restore LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry >> > > I think this is reasonable so I will try to implement it. Might take > me a couple of days (traveling out of country) so expect the next > patch series early next week. I just wanted to quickly check if you run into any troubles with the changes? Regards Marcel