Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp410583ybv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxocz50R6xTxxmCOR8s4TUJyli8S7sPjF24h58YnWSXk8bDUgfunr54E6yhEyIX6nvpYHp3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:b23:: with SMTP id t3mr2512170oij.88.1581591111239; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581591111; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BTPbiwxmSooHYWIY11RUTLciphyjOudVhG+5qCdOt0TUJaRZOIVZRDPOKxWuf85o2E sEbvuEBJFw2GgX+0VPLLflqeXlYUzp36lnkcjEpynZEi0/vCwvpViwbFHIk5Ew5yQ7Cs bDxOZOiOoaP2+mqsOC004a7FpthnuJHs99gZHTM/FT+zfuOf89Yvm9UThl320YNu/7Da DqnV/KHlSkpbuQceNuZUnFvuT3RZORpIR16PS3pLy3BVriVnK+w3GU7YigpsYrxQesi9 GicGwLoE7Qmc9J7GHGhw8cHrxF1M6eirannMpSlAFBHpN8z8YPCgzfQbGHs7z7AKXObq ObPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=a0AdfaSXewQASk+OQDLMZqVVvGG6bse26JEwu3kkGK8=; b=Q+OWj6C9SBdTZxfFpMVFcsdA7VpZYaLr+bcnMaFdDpyKcijO5BxymUIRRCaywlE1St y2+HVMUcCN0GfAxU3WdSXSUDICLKc5QtumWRfAOHPlzcJ2hkxFWntwH+75psmhhuPNDW pgLAYvoi/2PIs/Nc6UQtmsKejTgD+3TT2nDTaWnB3cwRrX/4SI5cmsW6wnLQfCeXoCkP azPgx/bIkIP7oDMUbuc0NoxUA4RQXWjJ0HdGPDax6vydvJeK+fIzE+3dz9bpYJqJqrRR tMKDYv7llHzdSQ+5yJYC1P5nDzqAifReRsQTzfAMoriyW7zFnHgcjwPwGbGF9BFl8nKF 8bxw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@c-s.fr header.s=mail header.b=j4nIpV63; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c196si1001276oib.36.2020.02.13.02.51.38; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 02:51:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@c-s.fr header.s=mail header.b=j4nIpV63; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729852AbgBMKuY (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:50:24 -0500 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([93.17.236.30]:39086 "EHLO pegase1.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729511AbgBMKuY (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 05:50:24 -0500 Received: from localhost (mailhub1-int [192.168.12.234]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48JCvx1tKgz9vBmx; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: localhost; dkim=pass reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.d=c-s.fr header.i=@c-s.fr header.b=j4nIpV63; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [192.168.12.234]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNMaryXYPCfP; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48JCvx0Nrhz9vBmv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=c-s.fr; s=mail; t=1581591021; bh=a0AdfaSXewQASk+OQDLMZqVVvGG6bse26JEwu3kkGK8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=j4nIpV63cfg4kmkQx5p0ao6MB3efkedTnFl3cl62wRxJIbdldqXF9DpkDOikDEbp7 MmBRHWqrHVH3uv8Syy+RBPHPoefCGrmzJ9qnve2+A4MqE/pXODXXQuWw/Pne5CDRRx 7mc3KVJvf2hLZhrwtE33a0vZQlRhywDc6m0/0jOU= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18E8B840; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id dp7BPwOlgiYQ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.4.90] (unknown [192.168.4.90]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4B88B83E; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:18 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Regression 5.6-rc1][Bisected b6231ea2b3c6] Powerpc 8xx doesn't boot anymore To: Rasmus Villemoes , Li Yang , Qiang Zhao , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Scott Wood , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , LKML , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <0d45fa64-51ee-0052-cb34-58c770c5b3ce@c-s.fr> <59487f8a-fd2e-703d-d954-d263f756a3a0@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:50:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <59487f8a-fd2e-703d-d954-d263f756a3a0@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 13/02/2020 à 10:37, Rasmus Villemoes a écrit : > On 12/02/2020 15.50, Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> >> On 02/12/2020 02:24 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >>> In your commit text you explain that cpm_muram_init() is called via >>> subsys_initcall. But console init is done before that, so it cannot work. >>> >>> Do you have a fix for that ? >>> >> >> The following patch allows powerpc 8xx to boot again. Don't know if >> that's the good place and way to do the fix though. >> >> --- >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c >> b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c >> index 4cabded8390b..341d682ec6eb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c >> @@ -1351,6 +1351,7 @@ static int __init cpm_uart_console_setup(struct >> console *co, char *options) >>          clrbits32(&pinfo->sccp->scc_gsmrl, SCC_GSMRL_ENR | SCC_GSMRL_ENT); >>      } >> >> +    cpm_muram_init(); >>      ret = cpm_uart_allocbuf(pinfo, 1); >> >>      if (ret) > > Hmm, that seems to be a somewhat random place, making it hard to see > that it is indeed early enough. Would it work to put it inside the > console_initcall that registers the cpm console? I.e. > > static int __init cpm_uart_console_init(void) > { > + cpm_muram_init(); > register_console(&cpm_scc_uart_console); > return 0; > } > > console_initcall(cpm_uart_console_init); > Yes that works too. Thanks Christophe