Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932411AbWBGWo7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:44:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932425AbWBGWnP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:43:15 -0500 Received: from b3162.static.pacific.net.au ([203.143.238.98]:54747 "EHLO cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932448AbWBGWnN (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:43:13 -0500 From: Nigel Cunningham Organization: Suspend2.net To: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:40:41 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Lee Revell , Jim Crilly , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1139282017.2041.44.camel@mindpipe> <20060207093737.GC1742@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060207093737.GC1742@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart43828972.nZj8ZxsGDD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200602071940.53843.nigel@suspend2.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2741 Lines: 81 --nextPart43828972.nZj8ZxsGDD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Tuesday 07 February 2006 19:37, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Po 06-02-06 22:13:36, Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:01 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > > > On 02/06/06 08:19:02PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 19:59 -0500, Jim Crilly wrote: > > > > > I guess reasonable is a subjective term. For instance, I've seen= =20 quite > > > > > a few people vehemently against adding new ioctls to the kernel=20 and > > > > > yet you'll be adding quite a few for /dev/snapshot. I'm just of=20 the > > > > > same mind as Nigel in that it makes the most sense to me that the > > > > > majority of the suspend/hibernation process to be in the kernel.= =20 > > > >=20 > > > > No one is saying that ANY new ioctls are bad, just that the KISS > > > > principle of engineering dictates that it's bad design to use=20 ioctls > > > > where a simple read/write to a sysfs file will do. > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > I understand that, but shouldn't the KISS principle also be applied=20 to > > > the user interface of a feature? > >=20 > > Personally I agree with you on suspend2, I think this is something that > > needed to Just Work yesterday, and every day it doesn't work we are > > losing users... but who am I to talk, I'm not the one who will have to > > maintain it. >=20 > It does just work in mainline now. If it does not please open bug > account at bugzilla.kernel.org. >=20 > If mainline swsusp is too slow for you, install uswsusp. If it is > still too slow for you, mail me a patch adding LZW to userland code > (should be easy). Pavel! Responses like this are precisely why you're not the most popular kernel=20 maintainer. Telling people to use beta (alpha?) code or fix it themselves=20 (and then have their patches rejected by you) is no way to maintain a part= =20 of the kernel. Stop being a liability instead of an asset! Nigel =2D-=20 See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode --nextPart43828972.nZj8ZxsGDD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD6GslN0y+n1M3mo0RAl2YAJ9GqHvVQ53K2G6yQUMaMmJ1ejpk3QCgpizb lKrr0WoVn9mytr6ZErBehwA= =4fZG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart43828972.nZj8ZxsGDD-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/