Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:02:14 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] printk: Declare log_wait as external variable
Message-ID: <20200213120214.GD36551@google.com>
References: <20200203131528.52825-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20200211124317.x5erhl7kvxj2nq6a@pathway.suse.cz>
 <20200212013133.GB13208@google.com>
 <20200212140355.56drih2wfcryjjtl@pathway.suse.cz>
 <8736bfdgsz.fsf@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8736bfdgsz.fsf@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On (20/02/12 15:24), John Ogness wrote:
> On 2020-02-12, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
[..]
> >> I can take a look at dev_ksmg.c/proc_kmsg.c option, unless
> >> someone else wants to spend their time on this.
> >
> > It would be lovely from my POV. I am only concerned about
> > the lockless printk() stuff. I would prefer to avoid creating
> > too many conflicts in the same merge window. Well, I am
> > not sure how many conflicts there would be. Adding John
> > into CC.
>
> I would also love to see these changes. But can we _please_ focus on the
> lockless printk ringbuffer merge first?

Agreed.

> The patches already exist and are (hopefully) being reviewed.
				^^^
				are (hopefully) being tested.

	-ss