Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:08:13 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To:     Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@google.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: Add MREMAP_DONTUNMAP to mremap().
Message-ID: <20200213120813.myanzyjmpyzixghf@box>
References: <20200207201856.46070-1-bgeffon@google.com>
 <20200210104520.cfs2oytkrf5ihd3m@box>
 <CADyq12wcwvRLwueucHFV2ErL67etOJdFGYQdqVFM2WAeOkMGQA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADyq12wcwvRLwueucHFV2ErL67etOJdFGYQdqVFM2WAeOkMGQA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:12:39AM -0800, Brian Geffon wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
> If the old_len == new_len then there is no change in the number of
> locked pages they just moved, if the new_len < old_len then the
> process of unmapping (new_len - old_len) bytes from the old mapping
> will handle the locked page accounting. So in this special case where
> we're growing the VMA, vma_to_resize() will enforce that growing the
> vma doesn't exceed RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, but vma_to_resize() doesn't handle
> incrementing mm->locked_bytes which is why we have that special case
> incrementing it here.

But if you do the operation for the VM_LOCKED vma, you'll have two locked
VMA's now, right? Where do you account the old locked vma you left behind?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov