Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030234AbWBGXDK (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:03:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030235AbWBGXDJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:03:09 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:14984 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030234AbWBGXDI (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:03:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:02:45 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: Lee Revell , Jim Crilly , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060207230245.GD2753@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <1139282017.2041.44.camel@mindpipe> <20060207093737.GC1742@elf.ucw.cz> <200602071940.53843.nigel@suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200602071940.53843.nigel@suspend2.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1702 Lines: 45 Hi! > > > Personally I agree with you on suspend2, I think this is something that > > > needed to Just Work yesterday, and every day it doesn't work we are > > > losing users... but who am I to talk, I'm not the one who will have to > > > maintain it. > > > > It does just work in mainline now. If it does not please open bug > > account at bugzilla.kernel.org. > > > > If mainline swsusp is too slow for you, install uswsusp. If it is > > still too slow for you, mail me a patch adding LZW to userland code > > (should be easy). > > > > Pavel! > > Responses like this are precisely why you're not the most popular kernel > maintainer. Telling people to use beta (alpha?) code or fix it I do not *want* to be the most popular maintainer. That is your place ;-). > themselves > (and then have their patches rejected by you) is no way to maintain a part > of the kernel. Stop being a liability instead of an asset! Ugh? Lee is a programmer. He wants faster swsusp, and improving uswsusp is currently best way to get that. It may be alpha/beta quality, but someone has to start testing, and Lee should be good for that (played with realtime kernels etc...). Actually it is in good enough state that I'd like non-programmers to test it, too. And yes, I'm a maintainer, and that means I have to reject bad patches from time to time, too. Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/