Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:36:45 -0500
From:   Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To:     Maksym Planeta <mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Cc:     Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, dm-devel@redhat.com,
        Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>,
        Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Remove WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE flag from unbound wq's
Message-ID: <20200213153645.GA11313@redhat.com>
References: <20200213141823.2174236-1-mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200213141823.2174236-1-mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 13 2020 at  9:18am -0500,
Maksym Planeta <mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:

> The documentation [1] says that WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE is "meaningless" for
> unbound wq. I remove this flag from places where unbound queue is
> allocated. This is supposed to improve code readability.
> 
> 1. https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/core-api/workqueue.html#flags
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maksym Planeta <mplaneta@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>

What the Documentation says aside, have you cross referenced with the
code?  And/or have you done benchmarks to verify no changes?

Thanks,
Mike