Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp688697ybv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:48:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyz/M8L6qKw8YugupzCQvJ/EUg9nQWkd3+5moVrrn2DhHaA4rXCLp1WzyzPTWQp3H0HmWB7 X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7f83:: with SMTP id t3mr10258589otp.63.1581608898591; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:48:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581608898; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VQAwIQ7KBUZOnBc9uHtTzE/nw5Noq1TFvo/2pZKRLz6zqa5JDa/833XmbjJmigFozD ok4AC3LZFXCmI5kRu0CSTG/pC5PE6/unzOQTfs0oBCz+IASyP7OEJdiD1le/VGWtdFhn wKaZdbXYUxQahkXBOulTYdXQ0N6+umkhCsfaamP6JBPh5shMyn8EgZ7Tgs9gokmKsVkG uaoFeiAa2skBWcORMZU6vbfA9f6DzlXli+jEZgHlIqMCBVO7qML4WNvVCeDshFsBOo3h EoC+srlr8gqiubkxTqXHQKdPwkScl6B/RBmutTFOZERJGYPmcJq7dfo61RtVc1JHRBVo b33g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=cQavrunLkGjPcAur4qw4Tlc4UHoQwpndNatIfL78Di4=; b=m96T46zT00cDCLh32pZnj3Rc7Dt56Up0grz/AVjlIWYQYh1sWL6cLZPWZSo7GxIQ0Z AaoKcJKGhfy1aX6/GVTSdDFalGf7fVk44/w1IWRDw92m4qrDhvKTk/w6g2sGN426QkEK 5cpd+Q5+fccfqXh3BHfksm9H3JP7sICpL4B8S6eBssit4VmsmQ9tKXfcF99xM9+xJHf3 i/SM9eQP+pmbdo3CQet1SQuCDHrH3XTgXI1xu/WfWESZ/J4P7LRBEvShGU/erZVU1wJM VkqJYOWOmECYV6bO+ig0BuDX74ivIkvBIR/tbOyLZJp3oD3hF+vKyTCvFEfJNzizUrdu VMDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i15si1344931otk.120.2020.02.13.07.48.05; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:48:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388003AbgBMPsB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:48:01 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:42722 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387891AbgBMPr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 10:47:59 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f00:477::3d5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0813D15B2C896; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:47:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:47:55 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20200213.074755.849728173103010425.davem@davemloft.net> To: manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org Cc: dcbw@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Migrate QRTR Nameservice to Kernel From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20200213153007.GA26254@mani> References: <20200213091427.13435-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <34daecbeb05d31e30ef11574f873553290c29d16.camel@redhat.com> <20200213153007.GA26254@mani> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:47:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Manivannan Sadhasivam Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:00:08 +0530 > The primary motivation is to eliminate the need for installing and starting > a userspace tool for the basic WiFi usage. This will be critical for the > Qualcomm WLAN devices deployed in x86 laptops. I can't even remember it ever being the case that wifi would come up without the help of a userspace component of some sort to initiate the scan and choose and AP to associate with. And from that perspective your argument doesn't seem valid at all.