Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965183AbWBHCuP (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:50:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965186AbWBHCuO (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:50:14 -0500 Received: from relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au ([203.220.32.149]:25483 "EHLO relay01.mail-hub.dodo.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965185AbWBHCuN (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:50:13 -0500 From: Grant Coady To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6 vs 2.4, ssh terminal slowdown Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:50:10 +1100 Organization: http://bugsplatter.mine.nu/ Reply-To: gcoady@gmail.com Message-ID: References: <20060208022411.GD14748@kvack.org> In-Reply-To: <20060208022411.GD14748@kvack.org> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1660 Lines: 37 On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:24:11 -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: >On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 01:11:49PM +1100, Grant Coady wrote: >> This console sluggishness is noticeable enough on older hardware for me to >> forgo exercising 2.6.latest.stable bugs for much time on it ;) >> >> For those suffering deja vu, yes, I reported this last month (or, recently). > >This bug report is a bit vague in terms of what the problem is -- the >test case hits 3 major subsystems (io, vm, net), all of which have changed >rather substantially in the course of 2.6 development. Vague 'cos I do not know where the problem is. One might say slowdown is like a near a 1ms delay per line output, but slowdown does not correlate to kernel tick frequency. :( > Would it be possible >to profile the system using oprofile to get an idea what the hotspots are? Perhaps, I've yet to try that. >Have you compared basic hard disk throughput with hdparm, as well as >ensuring DMA is enabled with 32 bit io? What about testing network >performance with netperf (or a netcat of /dev/zero)? A few more data points >would be quite helpful. Yes, the gross datapoints such as basic net i/o, disk i/o, say 2.6 is better/faster than 2.4 on this hardware, my problem is how to describe measured console slowdown in terms meaningful to you. I'll take a look at oprofile, report back if I can make sense of it ;) Grant. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/