Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp755133ybv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:57:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+AauixruBHsf2xOV72UteoJ5coBOZMqN66yYOOzQoiEWAq5W0Fu6i96fSkKn0Zujh56XN X-Received: by 2002:aca:ab0f:: with SMTP id u15mr3634431oie.26.1581613039839; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:57:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581613039; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BlCJKm7BvbgMh8Me0gkpvFH7FP3gj/kwl+2kJERtQjo2BB0KIny/Bd8Wbhti8u4b/O HsIvnk1ColVP3M+bRW/B+8mWcev1dbwhLMlf3fs9ZZXa8E6KF2li4kR/S9nSY3/DZph5 +VMkYsqoJc1dUpMoTwx6AguM0fTezS3cxg/yHqfYlLIIZUN5KC+3r4MmjiF+UT6N6CkF 3inb+jRH/VNsDQ7xiRSw49k0Sp7ELdwGjzY10GrqMmmSfRlumQCwgtXxaKuY38wwgDue sraRBPob/+KVhMnYUnvXpVkBLWyhcdp7Gnkmu0RD6Zybs6RSk3fUqAPcWzf4cJtNGwwf AJPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=QcUIWYXxcAhNgp1Iu6Gso5t1p9LC55NBTLUTnz37QNg=; b=I2+56swPMZ35RZOFO8VjE0wzmKxtnjScyIuLN+pBJ3oY83vOepxgaNGvtR/2F7jZqg fohE5J36e/G162aTxT087/pxcY+mZfTvv5wo2SPYfHPHh8RXUWiu3W0xF/6lTZyisCrX grfwbqhRkbF87PU7mQ2s50b6lLx82Aikx4sAiTzPT9DTepQsMGpcPh97OOEtqWasMZf0 HdPfSo7PkqLbE5v9x9dIYN+cM27Ct7JkpQHN9JPBTmHV7KndDXGjO6dJ+HVnZ2e2+8sK E+tplduCshE4ep5IdRXtLXEv1nHuu/bbmnYpkUDddyQt7geZopH80D0IuPXFIkRWfv2k LsfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si1344526oix.49.2020.02.13.08.57.07; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:57:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728333AbgBMQ4w (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:56:52 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:51064 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727873AbgBMQ4v (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:56:51 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A922328; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D15723F6CF; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:56:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:56:49 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/5] rbtree: optimize frequent tree walks Message-ID: <20200213165649.GG4333@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200207180305.11092-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20200209174632.9c7b6ff20567853c05e5ee58@linux-foundation.org> <20200210155611.lfrddnolsyzktqne@linux-p48b> <20200211112015.GA4543@sirena.org.uk> <20200213155520.bd332lzo4py27o5k@linux-p48b> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200213155520.bd332lzo4py27o5k@linux-p48b> X-Cookie: Academicians care, that's who. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:55:20AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020, Mark Brown wrote: > > As I said in reply to the regmap patch I'm really unconvinced that any > > benefit will outweigh the increased memory costs for that usage. > I'm not arguing the regmap case; if it's not worth it it's not worth it. > With that conversion I was merely hoping that sync was used enough for > it to be considered. Well, it's used a fair amount but like I say it's mainly used in the context of working out what I2C or SPI I/O to do so the amount of CPU time consumed is neither here nor there really, we'd have to be doing spectacularly badly for it to register. --JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl5Ff9AACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B4Kgf9HCwPNjHtGoW9j5TLEGB7JeXtMLOrBlKxoVQPtiwXtwyokA30Q7tQt5PW BPQS08kk3rdI+9rD7f+A/ixFnR4M3sfh5eFEvmryjcGoIphnjY2LzH3mvb5l4rIn E2c9ocqg0yH+LQr1lnbxwt/VUmRFO4DevR8e4QuE8Y3B873vNLOdiCLDP/sHkKuA bq06AYQiJWLeMWb8w9BAeVc9D42+Y8eRn7/t5WrPUrH0EytPnWC1/NHrpcajheij zTyykbV6KW1OxQ/w80wqprpQPhHrkOaMRqlsKTCwn1eBLRRQcnAS88o0G4msfnaZ ev9PLBy6/6DxI5H/NbOOEqu7KWkolQ== =+5EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JbKQpFqZXJ2T76Sg--