Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:39:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:39:04 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.97]:12563 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 14:38:49 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200110171839.WAA22514@ms2.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [NFS] NFSD over TCP: TCP broken? To: kalele@veritas.com (Shirish Kalele) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 22:39:08 +0400 (MSK DST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tamir@veritas.com, paulp@veritas.com In-Reply-To: <005a01c1579d$adab2100$3291b40a@fserv2000.net> from "Shirish Kalele" at Oct 17, 1 11:25:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > I'm making nfsd do blocking writes. I see. Well, then you should make this right. :-) > send(3N) manpage on Linux also says messages should be sent atomically. Sorry? Please, cite, I cannot find this. send() behaviour used to be pretty different. :-) Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/