Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1079938ybv; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:26:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyLK/IAi53JDSDotgIhq3KZ0uyVhWkJwBk5LkufZVxx9RBHlk/tTTV70CLSon+ny8HjpPOy X-Received: by 2002:aca:aa05:: with SMTP id t5mr5534oie.93.1581636413013; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:26:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581636413; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pYCSxjlaCYiyHhoQhNSYUPuuCU9l3tAf7ZYxQfPvgxYJ0YLJuOtvb8lNDudoyt5dhT QwdTzHFwSKlVLecFj5qrNF/mX6HNKUAsQ2Lwpm2I11/iExyXmbKgL5bKTOwovsWeJqxS yUmrwM21iV1Sx+6q6I8Mr/j5PVtWvgtWqQmyKVgAR22vEpDIyZnNmDXwm1DQ/67vzOv1 K/OAy53QkX/CpXIRGp3KRJOGGb+mKv4Eb0gOi9ZKA5o4Yx6C6qEDMDCj/O33cn43nSh1 ZWoCdK8d9LapPT4JLTXGfakzBydshbHnzFdCdw0ehsag4uD5fEM3GWd9MewHxGLgiuhD rpVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=DFV1PswQ2fEueX0QKQI5TtoubrKXvfDJMsXvd5ifz9o=; b=YWgMC+Wa8qe9bBpQJvVCeXgFvoIKhLv61LGAzOktmEoI+Wu6hog+qjgoukIR50JBM7 WCjpPYo48rbtuXAoJLkSJyDGEDzwWRxN3CgAl6tNCCUpeYypu0Q7h4tF45T2U2VMczMP 5ez5ml69iySXib2hV8jtKMfD85jebd9LEA1kgSRI6LcX1Qsd+/NIzAiybDLq6vVuIEak 9gJTYcJ5Cq15LlN/Dg7fxyi75k17zbk7sA45x7aLIB1fj4VVcWnkhuCfJF4Oj4xtDPS3 5WldqtM8i7YAKbwnK8tfG0JmPWCVZRaPOPs/euzQVOsgp04KhqmEu5VA1bo0nnbeZN49 D0Zg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n25si1836673oij.175.2020.02.13.15.26.40; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:26:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727931AbgBMXZb (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:25:31 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:59957 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727519AbgBMXZa (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:25:30 -0500 Received: from static-50-53-33-191.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net ([50.53.33.191] helo=[192.168.192.153]) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2NrM-00021t-T8; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:25:29 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/process: Swap out the ambassador for Canonical To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tyler Hicks Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner , Harry Wei , Alex Shi , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20200213214842.21312-1-tyhicks@canonical.com> <20200213231607.GA3925051@kroah.com> From: John Johansen Organization: Canonical Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:25:22 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200213231607.GA3925051@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/13/20 3:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:48:42PM +0000, Tyler Hicks wrote: >> John Johansen will take over as the process ambassador for Canonical >> when dealing with embargoed hardware issues. > > Can I get an ack from John to "prove" he is ok with this horrible task? :) > sure take away the plausible deniability ;)