Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
CC:     "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        "f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
Thread-Topic: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc
 transports
Thread-Index: AQHV4iK2/Nh1kKO7nUGh3zi/1UGt8agY85WAgADrEKA=
Date:   Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:59:03 +0000
Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB4481D227E34A95D22AFE3C9888150@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1581566330-1029-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <1581566330-1029-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com>
 <20200213105413.GA23374@bogus>
In-Reply-To: <20200213105413.GA23374@bogus>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 228c9d38-31ba-498e-307c-08d7b0e91605
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Feb 2020 00:59:03.8492
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: KNnhiKk/qQitTjtGAV4lzlFlRH2VnNVUFizhVPmiPVTg9zksc7+8w3s0/Rph3As637jn7fbxsBgbhJKboakC6w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM0PR04MB4866
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Sudeep,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc
> transports
>=20
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> >
> > SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no standardized
> > id, we need to use vendor specific id. So add into devicetree binding
> > doc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be
> under the /firmware/ node.
> >  	  protocol identifier for a given sub-node.
> >  - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size
> >  	  associated with it.
> > +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports
>=20
> IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more.

ok. Fix in v3.

>=20
> Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ?

Per our discuss in v1 patchset, mailbox/smc-id could be used
to differentiate mailbox and smc transports.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/11/226

So I still use "arm,scmi" for smc tranports.=20


Thanks,
Peng.

>=20
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep