Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965194AbWBHESt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:18:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932391AbWBHESt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:18:49 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:17864 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932190AbWBHESs (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:18:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:19:23 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Andi Kleen Cc: haveblue@us.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vserver@list.linux-vserver.org, herbert@13thfloor.at, serue@us.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org, ssouhlal@freebsd.org, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, dev@sw.ru, gkurz@fr.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, riel@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, saw@sawoct.com, dev@openvz.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, jes@sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace Message-Id: <20060207201923.1a97cfd6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <200602071033.23316.ak@suse.de> References: <1139273294.6189.170.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200602071033.23316.ak@suse.de> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1466 Lines: 33 On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:33:21 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tuesday 07 February 2006 01:48, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 12:19 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > p.s. My apologies at the size of the CC list. It is very hard to tell who > > > the interested parties are, and since there is no one list we all subscribe > > > to other than linux-kernel how to reach everyone in a timely manner. I am > > > copying everyone who has chimed in on a previous thread on the subject. If > > > you don't want to be copied in the future tell and I will take your name off > > > of my list. > > > > Is it worth creating a vger or OSDL mailing list for these discussions? > > There was some concern the cc list is getting too large. :) > > No, linux-kernel is fine. It will keep everybody informed, instead of > small groups doing their own things. But just keep the cc lists short please. > I'm sure all interested people can get it from l-k. OK. (Yes, I have a dream.) I'd like to see less traffic on lkml, with various things moved off to other mailing lists. According to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel, Jan. 2006 was a near record month and Feb. is on track to be large also. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/