Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030332AbWBHEuz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:50:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030333AbWBHEuz (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:50:55 -0500 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:38628 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030332AbWBHEuy (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:50:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:51:24 -0800 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Cc: ak@suse.de, haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@13thfloor.at, serue@us.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org, ssouhlal@freebsd.org, frankeh@watson.ibm.com, clg@fr.ibm.com, mrmacman_g4@mac.com, dev@sw.ru, gkurz@fr.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, greg@kroah.com, riel@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, saw@sawoct.com, dev@openvz.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, jes@sgi.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/20] Multiple instances of the process id namespace Message-Id: <20060207205124.29313365.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1139273294.6189.170.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200602071033.23316.ak@suse.de> <20060207201923.1a97cfd6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1009 Lines: 30 On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:28:04 -0700 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Randy.Dunlap" writes: > > > OK. (Yes, I have a dream.) > > > > I'd like to see less traffic on lkml, with various things moved off > > to other mailing lists. > > > > According to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel, > > Jan. 2006 was a near record month and Feb. is on track to be large also. > > A dream I can understand. > > However discussion about core kernel infrastructure is very much on > topic. Or nothing is on topic on the mailing list. > > Once this matures to the point where we are discussing the maintenance > of a subsystem we can consider moving off lkml. Yes, I wasn't referring to this particular topic for offloading. thanks, --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/