Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S277176AbRJQUlp>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:41:45 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S277188AbRJQUlf>; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:41:35 -0400
Received: from [209.195.52.30] ([209.195.52.30]:7437 "HELO [209.195.52.30]")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S277176AbRJQUld>;
	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 16:41:33 -0400
From: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: pierre@lineo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols???
In-Reply-To: <20011017163734.A23378@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.40.0110171219390.7368-100000@dlang.diginsite.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 17 Oct 2001, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:14:34PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > but there is a difference between a 'binary only' module and a 'GPL
> > module'
> >
> > the current process mixes the two up.
>
> Not really
> There is a list of "known not binary only" in modutils...
>
and the problem of the BSD licence, it may or may not be a binary only
module, knowing the license doesn't tell you.

David Lang

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/